Özet:

The purpose of this article is to examine what are the fundamental disadvantages of Turkish civil and military relations and whether there are possibilities of reconciliation for the establishment of a form of relationship in accordance with the standards and standards of Western democratic supervision. To this goal, first of all, we discussed the issues of what the Western civil control methods are, how they are applied and in what aspects they differ from the example of Turkey. It has been discussed what are the fundamental disagreements of the Turkish civil-armate relations and how much political authority and military elites agree on these matters. Finally, the possibilities of a democratic monitoring model set on the ground of a dialogue, cooperation, value and share of goals between civil and military elites and citizens have been questioned. The study based on the quality and secondary data has determined that the main challenges in civil and military relations in Turkey, rather than corporate reasons, are due to cultural divisions between the parties to the relationship. In other words, the study concluded that the aforementioned democratic surveillance model could be achieved if the problems that lead to divisions in political culture, such as religious-state relations, separatist Kurdish problem, militarist, educational and cultural patterns producing authority trends, and in this regard the crisis of democracy was solved. It is estimated that the study could enable a better understanding and interpretation of the dynamics of Turkish civil-armed relations and would contribute to the relevant literature in this context.

Anahtar Kelimeler: