Özet:

The recent discussions on the narrow and broad definition of terror that have become a current issue in Turkey-EU relations and consequently created a friction effect in Turkey’s foreign policy development process have problematized a parallax between the parties that lacks solution in the international area. Changes in the position of the observer or facts suffering virtual slip by an uniaxial view are imposed with an interpretation made according to that point of view. Terrorism, as an indirect behavior strategy implemented throughout history by societies (relatively weak groups) that live in negative asymmetry, has turned into a dominant strategic behavior which the strong groups resort to in the current hybridized war environment. Developments all around the globe have begun to be called as endless Global Civil War strategy. An important place in the emergence of a parallax in the view to and definitions of terrorism is held by not only partial strategic standing, but also the issue being framed by partial media as well as abstractions in legal and academic conceptualizations or generalizations. In this paper, the ontology of Terror and Terrorism as a concept is discussed in the context of strategy. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: