User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 7
 Views 87
 Downloands 34
2002 Sonrasında Türkiye’de Özelleştirme ve Demiryolu Hizmeti
2014
Journal:  
Mülkiye Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

The accumulation crisis, which was seemed initially in the developed capitalist countries in the beginning of 1970s, brought the end of Keynesian policies that were implemented after the Second World War as a solution for the Great Depression. This time, neo-liberalism had come into prominence for the solution of the crisis, and started a transition process to a new economic and social order. In contrast to the Keynesian period, minimizing the duties, responsibilities and services of the state was one of the primary purposes of the neo-liberalism. In the direction of ‘minimizing the state’, privatization policy had become a substantial agenda of the many governments of 1980s and had priority in terms of implementation. Also in Turkey, first steps towards to the privatization policy had taken by 1980s. Firstly, Turkey’s transition to the neoliberalism had started with the decisions which had been taken in 24th January 1980, and this was followed by the acts which provided the juridical basic of the privatization. Similar to the many countries around the world, early implementations of the privatization policy began in the middle of 1980s in Turkey and had been continuing nowadays. Justice and Development Party (AKP), which came to the power with the November 2002 elections, represents the breaking point in terms of implementation; 86 percent of the all privatizations between the years 1986-2014 realized in AKP period . In this regard, AKP distinguishes itself from the prior governments. One of the main factors that create the distinction is the privatization of the large-scale energy, transportation and communication enterprises/assets (TUPRAS, TELEKOM, harbors etc.) by AKP. Turkish Republic State Railways (TCDD), which is one of these large-scale public enterprises, and the railway service, has passed a new period in the last years. The railway service had been formed as a public monopoly with the nationalization process of the railways, and TCDD, which was established in 1927, became responsible for provisioning of the service. TCDD was formed as a verticalintegrated public enterprise that has the all direct/in-direct components of the railway service. The efforts to privatize the railway service and TCDD started in 1980s, but could not reach to the end until AKP period. With AKP, the process started with the privatization and shutting down of the assets or units that in-direct for the service. The decree law of 655 in 2011 and the act of 6461 in 2013 opened a new period for the railway service, and aimed to privatize the direct components of the service. The decree law of 655 has removed the public monopoly, liberalized the service and formed the units in the Ministry of Transport for ‘the regulation and the audition’ of the service. The act of 6461 is about TCDD directly and aims the fragmentation of TCDD to prepare it for the privatization. Fragmentation is a method, which is designed by European Union, World Bank, OECD and experienced in many countries, that aims to break the vertical-integrated organization structure. This paper aims to analyze AKP’s position with regard to the privatization policies and discusses the privatization process of the railway service, which is a public service and monopoly, and TCDD, which is responsible of provision of the service as a public enterprise. Privatization process also analyzed through European Union comparatively on the basis of the context and the method that used for privatization

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Mülkiye Dergisi
Mülkiye Dergisi