Citation Number
2
Views
36
Downloands
13
Dynamic structure of social movements creates certain problems in terms of classification of the phenomena. Given meanings during evolution do not reflect the characteristics of the movements. Moreover absolute definition of analysis and differentiation of preliminary acceptance makes this phenomenon difficult to classify and makes it conceptually ambiguous. This article draws attention to this problem in social movements literature with a question of “What is the driving force of history?” and suggests dual classification for assessments of social movements’ morphological change. Dual classification groups the assessment of social movements by autonomy of productive powers and, union of relations of production and productive powers.
dynamic structure creates social movements in certain problems of terms of classification of the threat given examples during evolution do not understand the characteristics of the movement moreover absolute definition of analysis and differentiation of critical acceptance makes this difficult to classify and makes it conceptually ambiguous this article draws attention to this problem in social science with a question of “what is the driving force of history” and progress dual classification for assessments of social movements’ morphological change dual classification groups the assessment of social movements by force of diplomacy power generation and diplomacy power generation
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley