User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 8
 Views 58
 Downloands 23
MONDROS MÜTAREKESİ DÖNEMİNDE SANSÜR
2011
Journal:  
Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları
Author:  
Abstract:

Birinci Dünya Savaşı’ndan sonra İtilaf Devletleri ve Osmanlı İmparatorluğu arasında imzalanan Mondros Ateşkesi, Türkiye’de, eşine az rastlanır bir otorite kaosuna neden olmuştur. İtilaf Devletleri, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu ve Türk Milliyetçileri arasında yaşanan bu otorite mücadelesi iletişim alanlarını da etkilemiştir. Dönemin güçleri için iletişim; propaganda, karşı propaganda, güvenlik ve istihbarat anlamına geliyordu. İletişimi kontrol altına almanın yegane yolu haberleşme, basın, yayın ve sanat üzerinde işletilen sansür mekanizmasıydı. Dönem içinde kişisel haberleşme mahremiyeti, basın ve sanat özgürlüğü ikincil önemde görülmüştür. Bu çalışmada, dönem içinde uygulanan sansürün işlevi ve etik sınırları sorgulanmaktadır

Keywords:

In the period of Montréal
2011
Author:  
Abstract:

After the First World War, the Mondros Treaty, signed between the opposition states and the Ottoman Empire, in Turkey, has caused a chaos of authority that is less common to his wife. The struggle of authority between the opposition states, the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish nationalists has also influenced the fields of communication. Communication for the forces of the time means propaganda, anti-propaganda, security and intelligence. The only way to control communication was the censorship mechanism operated on communication, press, broadcasting and art. In the period, personal communication privacy, freedom of the press and art have been seen as secondary. In this study, the functional and ethical limits of the censorship applied during the period are questioned.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları

Field :   İlahiyat

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 383
Cite : 321
2023 Impact : 0.135
Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları