User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 30
 Downloands 11
Aile Hekimliği Performans Değerlemesinin TOPSIS Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemiyle Belirlenmesi
2015
Journal:  
Alphanumeric Journal
Author:  
Abstract:

Bu çalışmada Sağlık Bakanlığı tarafından halka sunulan Aile Hekimliği uygulamasının performans analizi yapılmıştır. Kar-zarar ilişkisinden çok toplumsal fayda ilkesine göre hizmet üreten kamu sektörlerinde, performans yönetimi özel sektörlere göre farklı bir amaca hizmet etmektedir.  Temel hedef halka sunulan hizmet kalitesini etkinlik, etkililik ve verimlilik kriterleri ekseninde geliştirmektir. Bu çalışmada Çorum ili Alaca ilçesinde faaliyet gösteren 12 Aile Hekimliği biriminin 2012 yılına ait aylardaki performansları, 8 adet kriter verileri üzerinden Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Tekniklerinden TOPSİS yöntemi ile genel performansı gösteren tek bir puana çevrilmiş ve birimler arasında sıralama yapılarak, performansları karşılaştırılmıştır.Çalışmanın sonucunda birimlerin 12 ay boyunca aldıkları ideal çözüme göre yakınlık değerleri (Ci)’nin ortalaması alınarak yıllık bazda bir sıralama oluşturulmuştur. Ci puanlarının ortalamasına göre,  4 birimin performansları başarılı bulunurken, 5 birim normal performans göstermiş, 3 birimin performansının ise başarısız olarak saptanmıştır.

Keywords:

determining the ball of family medicine performance valuation with a very criteria decision making method
2015
Author:  
Abstract:

ın year this study a performance analysis was carried out in the family practice offered to the public by the ministry of health performance management services a different purpose in public conditions which provide service in compliance with the principles of social benefit than of a profitloss relationship in comparison with private sector main objectives herein was decided to improve the quality of the service offered to the public in terms of suchace as effectiveness and productivity scores of this study of hunger of 12 family practice units carrying on business in alaca district of corum in the months of the flexibility of the overall performance of the decision to the overall performance of the overall performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the performance of the performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of the maximum performance of

Performance Evaluation In Family Physician: The Application Of Topsis Multi-criteria Decision Making Method
2015
Author:  
Abstract:

In this study, a performance analysis was carried out for the Family Practice application offered to the public by the Ministry of Health. Performance management serves a different purpose in public sectors which provide service in accordance with the principle of social benefit rather than of a profit-loss relationship in comparison with private sectors. Main objective herein is to improve the quality of the service offered to the public in terms of such criteria as efficacy, efficiency and productivity. In this study, the performances of 12 Family Practice units carrying on business in Alaca district of Corum in the months of the year of 2012 were converted into a single score indicating the general performance level with the help of the TOPSIS method among the Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques through the data of 8 criteria and such units were put into order in this regard and their performances were compared.  At the end of the study, the proximity values (Ci) of the units according to the ideal solution they have received for 12 months were averaged and rated on a yearly basis.   According to the average of Ci scores, the performances of 4 units were founded to be successful whereas 5 units displayed normal performance and the performance of 3 units were decided to be ineffective. 

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles




Alphanumeric Journal

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 343
Cite : 762
2023 Impact : 0.194
Alphanumeric Journal