User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 92
 Downloands 37
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO EFL WHILE-LISTENING TECHNIQUES
2016
Journal:  
The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences
Author:  
Abstract:

In foreign or second language learning contexts, listening is often considered an essential yet undermined skill (Bidabadi, 2011; Scarcella & Oxford, 1992). In order to emphasize and increase the effectiveness of this ‘least-wondered skill’, innovative tools need to be researched. To this end, this study has aimed at investigating the use of two distinct while-listening techniques in EFL (English as a foreign language) lessons, namely ‘shadowing’ and ‘note-taking’. The major focus was to analyse the impact of these techniques on learners’ listening comprehension ability and changes in their perceptions of listening lessons and their own listening abilities. Specifically, the following research questions were asked: 1) which of the two while-listening techniques, namely ‘shadowing’ or ‘note-taking’, improves learners’ listening comprehension to a higher extent? and 2) how does each while-listening technique influence learners’ perceptions of and attitudes towards listening in the foreign language? The research was conducted with four groups of pre-intermediate level English language preparatory class students at a state university in Turkey. Groups were randomly assigned to receive training on either ‘shadowing’ or ‘note-taking’ from the same instructor for six consecutive weeks. Quantitative data include the pre-and post-test results for listening, as well as scores of comprehension check questions asked at the end of each training session. In addition, learner reflections provide information on students’ opinions and perspectives related with each technique. Quantitative findings indicate a significant difference between groups in terms of learners’ listening scores, and qualitative findings reveal various themes in relation to the techniques. 

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 276
Cite : 2.685
2023 Impact : 0.333
The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences