Abstract:

First ahkam commentary varietie named works is Tefsiru Hamsi Mieti Âyetin Mine’l-Kur’an of Mukatil b . Suleyman. Again, Imam Safii, Taberi and Cassas like scholars there are also works of tafsir that such canon law. The subject of this our article The Ahkam-ı Kur’aniyye of Konyalı Mehmet Vehbi his work is also a kind of commentary to ahkam as the name says. However, as a result of this work , our research from other ahkam commentary we have seen quite a different happened. Both in terms of methods which differ in terms of both threads was a property. Thus, a question arises Is should be referred to as a commentary on canon Korany or other name We examine the work of the author of the verses he received under the topics discussed , it is clear that is not in accordance with the method of exegesis exegesis has a unique manner. Located between classical interpretation methods The reason why the landing, the language subtleties, a method of the hadith was almost little or no . Especially in the interpretation of the subject as a very important issue to Ahkâm jurisprudence verse refers to the jurisprudence of the opinions of the imams or juridical sources in terms of a significant deficiency in the title of the work . This matter we are compared with other ahkam in section by detailed With commentary by processing the way that what we put out the differences between them.

Keywords: