It should be included the action of offender in the category of amd to perform punishment of retaliation to the offender because of the crime of murder. Abu Hanifa accepts only weapons and the tools used instead of weapons as a desicive criterion to include actions in the category of amd. Abu Hanifa who accepts opinion that it is impossible to know the intent of offender to kill, does not follow the method that determines by means of several criterion whether offender conduct his action with intent to kill and does not determine by means of intent of offender whether kisas is applied. In the field of iman (belief), Abu Hanife who follows the similar method, he claimed that it is impossible to know whether a person is believer or not, and he evaluates the acknowledgement (iqrâr) with tongue as a sufficient evidence for iman. In this article, it is analysed that Abu Hanifa follows the similar reasoning that take into account the apparant and evident one in determining of faith and intent which are two concepts which are related to inner will
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|