Özet:

Imam Bukhari acquired an important place in rijdl and rebuttal-amendment sciences with his works called at-Tarikh al-Kabir, at-Tarikh al-Awsat and ad-Du’afa al-Saghir and he was approved as an authority in these scienceTherefore, for determining his rebuttal-amendment method, it is important to reveal his attitudes about narrators of Ahlul Bi’dah. In the aforementioned works which Bukhari clasified about rijdl, he evaluated the narrators of Ahlul Bi’dah and he related from some of these narrators whom he evaluated based on some criterias he determined, but also he didn’t related from some of them. In this work, while examining Bukhari’s method about the narrators of Ahlul Bi’dah, Bukhari’s method is examined by a comparative method against the narrators who were evaluated as Ahlul Bi’dah by critics considered as authority in second century of hijra and it is explored whether these narrators are stated in Al Camius Sahih or not.

Anahtar Kelimeler: