Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 28
 Görüntüleme 83
 İndirme 29
İlköğretim Okul Yöneticilerinin Şiddet Türlerine Yönelik Görüşleri ve Şiddetle Başa Çıkma Yöntemleri
2012
Dergi:  
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi
Yazar:  
Özet:

Background. Violence is a major problem of today's society. Violence in schools is increasing every day and becoming a serious problem. School violence is considered in disciplines such as sociology and psychology, is one of the most important issue that produce negative consequences on the school climate, harm student's learning processes and prevent their development and also does not identify behavior, aggression and crimes.Violence is actually a part of human nature and a kind of suppressed behavior. It is the exertion of the power and strength that individual has to himself/herself, other people, other groups or a society through threatening or employing it. Such behaviors may result in injury or lost. One of the most important reasons of the violence is social relationships in society. Violence can be broadly defined as not only the intentional physical behaviors against another person but also the unintentional verbal psychological pressure. In that sense, violence is seen as a type of behavior includes restricting the rights and liberties (Ergil, 2001; Şahin Beyazova, 2001). The types of violence encountered in societal and daily life; • Violence towards oneself: suicide, the behaviors that damage the body. • Violence between people: the violence towards woman, child, elderly, violence in the family, dating violence. • Systemized violence: international violence, collective violence, political violence, power violence, violence towards the power. • Media violence: the violence which is caused by the sounds, the images and the articles in the written press and broadcast media. • Other types of violence: gang violence, blood feud, street violence, body and human trade, pornography, violence towards homosexual and lesbian, violence towards minorities, violence in school, work and sport. Violence in school is a problem that is present in the whole world. Violence in school violates the safety of a child and can severely jeopardize their normal psychophysical development. School teachers and parents can help in violence prevention in schools. Violence in school emerges in the form of a threatening environment, physical harm, emotional pressure and this situation is a big handicap for pupils' success. Violence in school is one of the forms of emerging of adults' reactional life. Children are both perpetrators and victims. The violence incidents can be prevented by the help of the effective curriculums that will be put into practice at the schools. Purpose. This study aims to investigate the opinions of primary school administrators on school violence, type of violent behavior among students, the study was conducted in 2008-2009 academic year on primary school administrators who work at 122 primary schools in Eskisehir city center. To investigate opinions gender, professional seniority, graduated from program and position taken as a variable. Method. The scale “The types of behavior encountered among pupils in schools” used in the study was upgraded by Turan, Çubukçu Girmen (2008) in line with the classifications in the survey “Bullying and Violence” which was prepared by Çınkır and Karaman-Kepenekçi (2003). The first part of scale is personal information form, second part involved totally 26 items related to types of behavior under five sub-dimensions (types of violence). The third part involved two open-ended question, which asked administrators to express their feelings and opinions about the ‘violence' concept and method's coping with violence. After the factor analysis 2 item have been taken from the scale. To test the reliability of the scale “The Types of Behavior Experienced among Pupils in Schools” for each group Cronbach Alpha coefficient was measured. Cronbach Alpha coefficient is between .66 and .88 for each sub factor. The scale applied to 210 primary school administrator. In this study quantitative data was collected through a scale. In the analysis of the quantitative data, arithmetic means and standard deviation were computed, and for the sub-aims of the study; Mann Whitney-U and Kruskal Wallis-H test were computed. After the analysis of variance, when the statistics of the Kruskal Wallis-H test was significant, the source of the difference was searched using the Mann Whitney-U test. Findings. According to the findings of study; primary school administrators were noted that verbal type of violence was the highest among students. A significant difference was found Physical type of violence, in terms of the gender of administrators in favor of female administrators, sexual type of violence, in terms of task of administrators in favor of assistant administrator, sexual, emotional and physical type of violence according to the seniority variable, and in favor of emotional type of violence, according to graduates` teaching institutions. Conclusion. According the results of the study ‘Comparing the Proportion of Whipping in Schools Between 1992 and 2002' done by Gözütok, Er ve Karacaoğlu (2006), whereas the psychical punishment that the pupils mostly experience was slapping in 1992, pulling ear took its place in 2006. In addition, the study stated that the frequency of being exposed to physical punishment increased comparing to past. School administratorsWhen we look at the arithmetic mean of their scores from scale for examining the most dominant factor is the type of verbal violence than physical violence. Different studies can design, including students, teachers, administrators, staff, and parents involving all stakeholders. There are lots of studies in the literature about school violence but when we look at the effectiveness of studies in practice, the number of studies is very small. For this reason, long-term efficacy studies, can be designed and their effectiveness can be analyzed.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler










Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi