Özet:

The so-called forms of “ijazat” which are of great significance within hadith narration process were taken to mean that a hadith student ask for permission to narrate a hadith which he received from his teacher and teacher permits him to narrate it without checking his knowledge of hadith narrative. We understand from the related narratives that the forms of ijazat, which took place commonly in the narration of hadith after the second period of Hijrah, were providing the hadith followers with an easier way to narrate the hadith and became necessary ways occasionally after the oral narratives were written down on the books. As a conclusion, in the history of hadith, so-called definite and indefinite forms of ijazat were applied commonly, while the other forms of ijazat were applied rarely and these forms were systematized according to their rare application via abstraction. Hence, scholarly speculative statements about ijazat and munawala in the hadith literature seem to be mostly intellectual (i.e., abstract) products rather than they search for a solution for the practical problems in hadith narration We understand from the related narratives that the forms of ija-zat, which took place commonly in the narration of hadith after the second period of Hijrah, were providing the hadith followers with an easier way to narrate the hadith and became necessary ways occasionally after the oral narratives were written down on the books. As a conclusion, in the history of hadith, so-called definite and indefinite forms of ijazat were applied commonly, while the other forms of ijazat were applied rarely and these forms were systematized according to their rare application via abstraction. Hence, scholarly speculative statements about ijazat and munawala in the hadith literature seem to be mostly intellectual (i.e., abstract) products rather than they search for a solution for the practical problems in hadith narration.

Anahtar Kelimeler: