Özet:

Sri Lanka has bearded much of the pain in his long history, he captured by Britain and after the colonial time so many time civil war occurred in there. Finally, the civil war was ended in 2009, the Tamil’s separatist group, which called Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), was defeated by the central government powers.  Some human rights organizations and NGOs followed to a process of the peace after the civil conflict in Sri Lanka and they believe that neither civil war nor violation in Sri Lanka did not finish, moreover gaps between two ethnic sides is widening. On the contrary Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) rejected all claims and arguments, and declared to peace and ended of the war.  But still, a question in there: What kind of peace or peace for whom?      The purpose of the study is to explain how the civil war has occurred in Sri Lanka and why negative peace did not transform to positive peace, which is taking by Galtung’s peace theory, after the end of the war.  The historical background of the war and theoretical analysis is using to evaluate what was a problem in Sri Lanka, and sustainability of the negative peace in there without any accountability and with identity politics. This research concluded that four main congestions to positive peace.

Anahtar Kelimeler: