Citation Number
2
Views
73
Downloands
18
Rüşvet suçu, kamu görevlisinin görevinin ifasıyla ilgili bir işi yapması veya yapmaması amacıyla, doğrudan veya aracılar vasıtasıyla, kendisine veya göstereceği bir başka kişiye menfaat temin etmesidir. Kamu görevlisine haksız menfaat sağlanmasının karşılığı olan iş ya da eylemin kamu idaresinin yerine getirdiği kamusal faaliyetin kapsamında olması gerekir. Bu nedenle rüşvet suçunda anlaşma konusu işin göreve dahil olması gerekir. Rüşvet suçunun unsuru olarak kabul edilen görevin kapsamı önceden belirlenmelidir. Görevin kapsamı belirlendikten sonra göreve dahil olan iş yada eylem rüşvet anlaşmasında somutlaştırılır. Diğer ifadeyle sağlanan haksız menfaat ile görevin ifasıyla ilgili iş ya da eylem arasında illiyet bağı rüşvet anlaşmasında kurulmuş olur. Sonuç olarak anlaşma konusu iş hem göreve dahil olmalı hem de rüşvet anlaşmasında belirlenmelidir.
The crime of corruption is the fact that a public officer, in order to perform or not perform a work related to the expression of his duty, directly or through intermediaries, provides interest to himself or to another person he will show. The public service must be in the framework of the public activity performed by the public administration of the work or the action which is compensated for the provision of unfair interest to the public service. Therefore, the contract subject in the corruption crime must be included in the task. The scope of the task that is considered the element of the corruption crime must be determined in advance. After the scope of the task is determined, the work or action involved in the task is concrete in the corruption agreement. In other words, the unfair benefit provided with the expression of the job or action relating to the job or action is established in the ransom agreement. As a result, the contract subject business must be both included in the task and must be determined in the corruption agreement.
The bribery is committed when a public official, directly or through other persons, takes an advantage for himself or another person designated by him, in order for him to perform or not to perform a task with regard to his duty. The perform or action against the provision of unfair benefits to the public official should be within the scope of the public activity carried out by the public administration. It is not a bribery if the officer gains benefit in exchange for perform or action not included in the task. The scope of the duty considered as an element of the bribery must be determined in advance. Any act contrary to or in accordance with the requirements of the duty is considered an element of the bribery. Broad or narrow interpretation of the scope of duty affects criminal liability. The nature of the perform or action performed or exercised by the public official with special effort is important for the determination of criminal responsibility. The causal link between the unfair benefit provided and the perform or action related to the performance of the duty should be established in the bribery agreement. For this reason, the perform or action that needs to be fulfilled must be concretized in advance.
Field : Hukuk
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
