Özet:

The Muslim allies, along with their translation activities, have shown different attitudes against Aristotle’s logic entering the Islamic world within the Greek philosophical heritage. The Gazzalians and their followers accepted Aristotle’s logic and the burhany, which is the means of his accurate knowledge, as a method for the Nazareth Sheriff sciences. Ibn Teymiyye and his followers were strongly opposed to the structure of the Islamic Charity and to the fate of man. In addition to having a philosophical background, he opposed Aristotle’s logic with reasons such as being contrary to the predecessor’s method of practice and simplicity, and as an alternative, he proposed the method of spiritual stability. In fact, it is a reasonable way to understand the logic, and it is a reasonable way to understand the logic, and it is a reasonable way to understand the logic. In this article, it is attempted to explain the logical concepts and conclusions that Shâtıbî used to identify and evaluate its objections to the logic. In addition, the logic-centered burhan method adopted by Gazzali against the Shâtıbî’s proposed means to make it possible to compare the axis and predecessor spiritual stability method, can be regarded as a matter that makes this work important.

Anahtar Kelimeler: