Özet:

When we talk about the interpretation of the process, the first meaning that comes to mind is how the interpretation is done. When the book is written, the book is written, and the book is written. It can be said that the process and method calls the same thing. When we look at the meaning of the word "Usûl" we can understand the elements that come before the word or methods instead of the case and the basis for it. But especially today, when it is studied the interpretative works that are written, it appears that the elements that will form the basis of the method before the method are not discussed. They are also in the fields that are not associated with the methods and methods. This is the case that requires the evaluation of the works of this kind and the interpretation of the works of this kind and the interpretation of the works of this kind. This study shows that the word usûl needs a different perspective from the meaning of the world. In this book we first discuss the truth, the truth, the truth, the truth, the truth, the truth. If some of the proceedings are indicated, the purpose of our research is not to identify the original and original principles of the proceedings and present it as a proposal.

Özet:

When we mention about Tafsīr method, the method of how to tafsīr is the first thing that comes to one’s mind. When the books of tafsīr method are mentioned, one can understand the books revealing this method. In this way, we may say that the method and “uṣūl” evoke the same thing on minds. When we look at the meaning of the word “uṣūl”, we may firstly understand the elements that form the basis of these methods instead of bases or methods. However, when we examine the recent books of tafsīr method, it is seen that the elements that form the basis of the method are not discussed before the method itself. Also, those books include in the content and aspects that are not related to the “uṣūl” and methods as well. This situation requires an assessment of such books and a writing of commentary works from a different perspective. By considering the issue, this study reveals the need for a different point of view based on the meaning of the word “uṣūl”. First of all, in this article, it is discussed that a book of “uṣūl” should reveal the originals and the fundamental on which the holistic bases are emphasized. Although some principles are pointed out, the purpose of our research is not to determine the original and asymptomatic principles of the tafsīr and to present it as an offer.

Anahtar Kelimeler: