User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 4
 Views 65
 Downloands 25
LOJİSTİK MALİYETLER İÇİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YAKLAŞIMI: DEPOLAMA ALANI SEÇİMİ ÖRNEĞİ
2019
Journal:  
Uluslararası Davranış, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Yönetim Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

When the cost chain in all processes from production to consumption is analyzed, it is seen that logistics costs have a significant weight. It is a fact that most of these costs do not have any added value for the customer who is the ultimate user of the product. At this point, it is important to control the logistics processes and manage them very well in terms of cost efficiency. Because in the globalizing world, the areas that enterprises can take into consideration for profitability are increasingly restricted. The raw material prices as well as all kinds of equipment used in the production processes, are very close to each other in terms of cost. This would mean decreasing the costs by reducing the profit margin or making improvements in all processes. Warehousing activities, which are completely unimportant to the customer and have no added value to the product, should also be evaluated within this scope and cost effective approaches should be adopted in the storage related processes. In the study, the weighted product model and additive weighting method, which are one of the multi criteria decision making techniques, were applied by considering the same criteria in the storage area selection and the results were compared.

Keywords:

LOJİSTİK MALİYETLER İÇİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YAKLAŞIMI: DEPOLAMA ALANI SEÇİMİ ÖRNEĞİ
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

When the cost chain in all processes from production to consumption is analyzed, it is seen that logistics costs have a significant weight. It is a fact that most of these costs do not have any added value for the customer who is the ultimate user of the product. At this point, it is important to control the logistics processes and manage them very well in terms of cost efficiency. Because in the globalizing world, the areas that enterprises can take into consideration for profitability are increasingly restricted. The raw material prices as well as all kinds of equipment used in the production processes, are very close to each other in terms of cost. This would mean decreasing the costs by reducing the profit margin or making improvements in all processes. Warehousing activities, which are completely unimportant to the customer and have no added value to the product, should also be evaluated within this scope and cost effective approaches should be adopted in the storage related processes. In the study, the weighted product model and additive weighting method, which are one of the multi-criteria decision making techniques, were applied by considering the same criteria in the storage area selection and the results were compared.

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Uluslararası Davranış, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Yönetim Dergisi

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 163
Cite : 620
2023 Impact : 0.195
Uluslararası Davranış, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Yönetim Dergisi