User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 18
 Views 1.094
 Downloands 63
 Audio Listening 1
BENTHAM VE MİLL’İN KLASİK FAYDACILIĞI BAĞLAMINDA MUTLULUK PROBLEMİ
2017
Journal:  
Temasa Journal of Philosophy
Author:  
Abstract:

Günümüzünetkili ahlak kuramlarından biri olan ve Batı dünyasında yaygınlık kazanan faydacılık, hazzı ölçüt olarak kabul eden mutlulukçu bir ahlak anlayışıdır. Faydacılığıniyi davranışıçok sayıda insanabüyük mutluluğu sağlayacak eylem olarak formüle etmesi birçok insana cazip gelmektedir. Ancak düşünürler tarafından yapılan sorgulamalar, faydacılığın cazibesine gölge düşürmekte ve faydacı mutluluk anlayışının birçok sorunu ihtiva ettiğini göstermektedir. Bu sorgulamalar, mutluluk ve haz kavramlarının bireylere ahlakî birer ilke olarak rehberlik etmede yeterli açıklığa sahip olmadığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu makalenin özü, klasik faydacılığın kurucuları olan Jeremy Bentham ve John StuartMill’in ana savları ile çeşitli düşünürlerin bu savlara karşı ortaya koyduğu eleştirilerin tartışılmasından oluşmaktadır.Klasik faydacılık, ahlakı basit bir kurala ve tek bir kavrama indirgemeye çalışmıştır ancak bu çaba bazı sorunlara yol açmıştır. Ahlak, çok boyutlu olduğu için mutluluk veya haz gibi tek bir kavrama indirgenemez. Öte yandan mutluluk, bu çalışmada da görüleceği üzere basit bir hesaplama ile ulaşılabilecek bir durum değildir.

Keywords:

The problem of happiness in connecting BENTHAM and MILL's classical benefits
2017
Author:  
Abstract:

Beneficiality, which is one of the modern moral theories and is widespread in the Western world, is a happy moral understanding that is considered a standard of pleasure. It appears to be attractive for many people to formulate its beneficial behavior as an action that will provide great happiness. But the questions by the thinkers shade the attraction of utility and show that the sense of useful happiness contains many problems. These questions show that the concepts of happiness and pleasure do not have sufficient clarity in guiding individuals as a moral principle. The essence of this article consists in the discussion of the main arguments of the founders of classical utility, Jeremy Bentham and John StuartMill, and the criticism of various thinkers against these arguments.Classical utility has tried to reduce ethics to a simple rule and a single concept, but this effort has led to some problems. Because morality is multi-dimensional, it cannot be reduced to a single concept such as happiness or pleasure. On the other hand, happiness is not a situation that can be achieved by a simple calculation, as it will be seen in this study.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Temasa Journal of Philosophy

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 239
Cite : 293
Temasa Journal of Philosophy