Views
68
Downloands
32
Amaç- Basel I’in eksikliklerini gidermek amacıyla 1999’da “Yeni Basel Sermaye Yeterliliği Uzlaşısı” olarak tanımlanan yeni kurallar, Basel I’in aksine, her bankanın kendi kriterlerini, düzenleme çalışmalarını ve tercihlerini, yine o banka şart ve uygulamalarına göre belirleyebilmelerini amaçlamıştır. Basel I uygulamalarında olduğu gibi Basel II uygulamaları da eleştirilere maruz kalmış, en çok eleştiri alan yönü ise uzlaşıda çok fazla sayıdaki konulara getirilen standartlar ve bunların gerçekleştirilme güçlüğü olarak belirlenmiştir. Getirilen eleştiriler ve krizin de ortaya çıkmasıyla 2010 yılında Basel II’nin yerini, likidite karşılama oranı, kaldıraç oranlarına getirilen sınırlama ve sermayenin güçlendirilmesine yönelik yeniliklere yer veren Basel III düzenlemeleri almıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı Basel II’de tanımlanan ‘operasyonel risk’ kavramı ve bankalarda operasyonel riskin uygulanmasını incelemektir. Method- Bu çalışmada Basel II Uzlaşısı uygulamalarının operasyonel risk açısından etkileri üzerinde durulmuştur. Bulgular- Operasyonel riskin tanımı, risk ölçüm ve yönetim süreçleri, operasyonel kayıp türleri Sonuç- Bilgi sistemlerinin denetimi, CobIT süreçleri ve uygulama metotları, ilgili tebliğ ve yönetmelikleri
Purpose- The new regulation "The New Basel Capital Agreement" which has been created in order to eliminate the shortcomings of Basel I, in 1999, Basel II, aimed to modify each bank's own criteria, regulatory activities and preferences, according to the banks' own terms and practices. Basel II standards are also criticized as well as Basel I. The most critical aspect of Basel II was its standards to many issues and their difficulties in realization. With the criticism of Basel II and the emergence of the crisis, in 2010, Basel III regulations came into effect with its innovative standards such as strengthening capital, liquidity coverage ratio, and restrictions to leverage ratio. The aim of this study is to examine 'operational risk' and application of operational risk in banks as given in Basel II. Methodology- In this study, Basel II New Capital Accord risk categories within three pillars and the effects of Basel II regulation on operational risk are investigated. Findings- Definition of operational risk, processes of risk measurement and management, operational losses Conclusion- Audit of information systems, CobIT processes and methods
Purpose- The new regulation "The New Basel Capital Accord" which has been created in order to eliminate the shortcomings of Basel I, in 1999, Basel II, aimed to modify each bank's own criteria, regulatory activities and preferences, according the banks’ own terms and practices. Basel II standards also are criticised as well like Basel I. The most critical aspect of Basel II was its standards to many issues and their difficulties in realization. With the criticism to Basel II and the emergence of the crisis, in 2010, Basel III regulations came into effect with its innovative standards such as strengthening capital, liquidity coverage ratio, and restrictions to leverage ratios. The aim of this study is to examine ‘operational risk’ and application of operational risk in banks as given in Basel II. Methodology- In this study, Basel II New Capital Accord risk categories within three pillars and the effects of Basel II regulation on operational risk are investigated. Findings- Definition of operational risk, processes of risk measurement and management, operational losses Conclusion- Audit of information systems, CobIT processes and methods
Field : Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
