Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 76
 İndirme 35
İslam Hukuk Metodolojisinde Nasların Mubahlığa Delalet Etme Yolları
2019
Dergi:  
Şırnak Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Yazar:  
Özet:

Shariah provisions in Islamic theory; it is basically divided into five: vacip, mendub, mubah, mekruh and haram. Mubah expresses the legally free areas where man is free to do or not. Among the Sharia provisions, the most broad scope is the provisions that are categorized as “mubah“. As a matter of fact, prohibitions (harams) in Islamic law are limited and they are determined by relıgıous texts (nass). In principle, the conditions outside the prohibitions (harams) constitute the halal (legally free) area. In fiqh literature, halal is sometimes used as a synonym for mubah, but when it is mentioned as absolute, it includes mendup and vacib. Therefore, it is important to identify the styles / ways expressing ibaha (legal freedom) separately. The word “ibaha”, which denotes legal freedom, or the derivatives of this word are not available in the Qur’an, but the word “ibaha” is  available in the  some texts of Hadiths. On the other hand, in theory of Islamic provisions it was accepted as a fundamental principle that ibaha (legal freedom) was essential in cases outside of the provisions stating the absolute obligation and prohibition. As a matter of fact, there are many expressions / styles in Quran and Sunnah texts, which express legal freedom directly or indirectly. Ways of knowing the legal freedom in the works of classical jurisprudence have not been emphasized. Islamic jurists of the last period have examined the ways to know the legal freedom under the titles of “turuku ma’rifeti’l-ibâha”, “esâlîbü’l-ibâha” ve “sîyağu’l-ibâha”. However, in these studies, the ways of knowing ibaha/mubah have not been examined as a whole. The ways of knowing the ibaha (legal freedom) in theory of Islamic provisions are basically divided into religious texts and non-religious means. The signification of religious texts to ibaha (legal freedom) is in two ways: direct and indirect. In principle, mubah provisions, which are called as shariah ibaha, are fixed by relıgıous texts. In this article,  the ways of expression/indication of relıgıous texts (nass) to mubah (legal freedom) in theory of ıslamic provisions will be focused on.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

İslam Hukuk Metodolojisinde Nasların Mubahlığa Delalet Etme Yolları
2019
Yazar:  
Özet:

Shariah provisions in Islamic theory; it is basically divided into five: vacip, mendub, mubah, mekruh and haram. Mubah expresses the legally free areas where man is free to do or not. Among the Sharia provisions, the most broad scope is the provisions that are categorized as "mubah". As a matter of fact, prohibitions (harams) in Islamic law are limited and they are determined by relegious texts (nass). In principle, the conditions outside the prohibitions (harams) constitute the halal (legally free) area. In fiqh literature, halal is sometimes used as a synonym for mubah, but when it is mentioned as absolute, it includes mendup and vaic. Therefore, it is important to identify the styles / ways expressing ibaha (legal freedom) separately. The word "ibaha", which denotes legal freedom, or the derivatives of this word are not available in the Qur'an, but the word "ibaha" is available in some texts of the Hadiths. On the other hand, in the theory of Islamic provisions it was accepted as a fundamental principle that ibaha (legal freedom) was essential in cases outside of the provisions stating the absolute obligation and prohibition. As a matter of fact, there are many expressions / styles in the Quran and Sunnah texts, which express legal freedom directly or indirectly. Ways of knowing the legal freedom in the works of classical jurisprudence have not been emphasized. Islamic jurists of the last period have examined the ways to know the legal freedom under the titles of "turuku ma'rifeti'l-ibâha", "salîbü'l-ibâha" and "syağu'l-ibâha". However, in these studies, the ways of knowing ibaha/mubah have not been examined as a whole. The ways of knowing the ibaha (legal freedom) in the theory of Islamic provisions are basically divided into religious texts and non-religious means. The meaning of religious texts to ibaha (legal freedom) is in two ways: direct and indirect. In principle, mubah provisions, which are called as shariah ibaha, are fixed by relegious texts. In this article, the ways of expression/indication of reliable texts (nass) to mubah (legal freedom) in theory of Islamic provisions will be focused on.

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler








Şırnak Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi

Alan :   İlahiyat

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 429
Atıf : 739
2023 Impact/Etki : 0.057
Şırnak Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi