User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
Institutional References Quartile Statistics FAQ User Guide Contact us
Institutional Application Application for Journals
Türkçe English
  Citation Number 1
 Views 80
 Downloands 26
Menu
Mendeley
Endnote
HARDT VE NEGRİ’NİN KÜRESEL DEMOKRASİ DÜŞÜNCESİ İLE LACLAU VE MOUFFE’UN RADİKAL DEMOKRASİ PROJESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ANALİZİ
2019
Journal:  
Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Author:  
DOI:  
10.26468/trakyasobed.461524
Abstract:

This article focuses on two different thoughts, which are part of the contemporary democracy theory.  At their cores, both radical democracy project of Laclau & Mouffe and global democracy thought of Hardt & Negri emerged as a solution to the crisis that liberal democracy is facing. In either of these two democracy projects the concepts of subject, class, identity, hegemony, minority and revolution are discussed. In this regard, this article claims that global democracy project, which was explained by Hardt & Negri with the concepts of multitude and empire, is a critic of the radical democracy theory.

Keywords:

HARDT and NEGRI’s Global Democracy Thought with LACLAU and MOUFFE’s Radical Democracy Project
2019
Journal:  
Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Author:  
DOI:  
10.26468/trakyasobed.461524
Abstract:

This article focuses on two different thoughts, which are part of the contemporary democracy theory.  At their core, both the radical democracy project of Laclau & Mouffe and the global democracy thought of Hardt & Negri emerged as a solution to the crisis that liberal democracy is facing. In either of these two democracies projects the concepts of subject, class, identity, hegemony, minority and revolution are discussed. In this regard, this article claims that the global democracy project, which was explained by Hardt & Negri with the concepts of multitude and empire, is a critic of the theory of radical democracy.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles
1. Radikal Demokrasi Projesi ve Müzakereci Demokrasi
2017


  Details
 Download PDF
2. Michael Oakeshott ve Radikal Demokrasi
2013


  Details
 Download PDF
3. A Curious Merger In The Search For A Democratic Political Community: Michael Oakeshott And Radical Democracy
2013


  Details
 Download PDF
4. The Idea of Freedom in Radical and Delibe-rative Models of Democracy
2012


  Details
 Download PDF
5. Anayasal Kuruluş Konusunda Kapanmayacak Tartışma: Hannah Arendt ve Carl Schmitt’te Kurucu İktidar Sorunu
2015


  Details
 Download PDF
6. Chantal Mouffe’un Radikal Demokrasi Projesi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme
2014


  Details
 Download PDF
Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri; Filoloji; Güzel Sanatlar; Hukuk; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.142
Cite : 5.357
2023 Impact : 0.181
Details
Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi