User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 21
 Views 65
 Downloands 32
KURUMSAL KAYNAK PLANLAMA (KKP) SİSTEMLERİNİN SEÇİMİNDE MACBETH VE MABAC YÖNTEMLERİNİN BÜTÜNLEŞİK OLARAK KULLANILMASI
2019
Journal:  
Trends in Business and Economics
Author:  
Abstract:

Kurumsal kaynak planlama (KKP) sistemleri, işletmelerin farklı birimleri arasındaki koordinasyonu sağlayarak, daha hızlı ve kolay karar alınmasını sağlayan sistemlerdir. Dolayısıyla, işletmeler için doğru KKP sisteminin seçim kararı oldukça önemli bir konudur. Bu sistemlerin seçiminde dikkate alınması gereken çok sayıda kriter bulunduğundan, seçim sürecinde çok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) yöntemlerinden yararlanmak mümkün olacaktır. Bu çalışmada Bu çalışmada ÇKKV yöntemlerinden MACBETH ve MABAC yöntemleri bütünleşik olarak kullanılarak,iyi KKP sisteminin seçilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Subjektif bir yöntem olan MACBETH ile kriterin önem ağırlıkları hesaplanmış, MABAC yöntemiyle ise sistem alternatifleri değerlendirilmiştir. Uygulama sonuçlarına göreönemli kriterler fonksiyonellik, kullanım kolaylığı ve marka imajı olarak belirlenirken;iyi sistem alternatifi ise SAP olarak tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords:

In the selection of Corporate Resource Planning (KKP) systems, the use of the MACBETH and MABAC methods as a whole
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

Corporate Resource Planning (CCP) systems are systems that make decisions faster and easier by providing coordination between the different units of the enterprises. Therefore, choosing the right KKP system for is a very important issue. Since there are many criteria to be taken into consideration in the selection of these systems, it will be possible to take advantage of the methods of multi-criteria decision making (CPC) in the election process. In this study, the aim of this study is to select the good KKP system by integrating the MACBETH and MABAC methods from the CKKV methods. A subjective method, MACBETH, calculated the importance of the criteria, and MABAC method assessed the system alternatives. The criteria that are relevant to the application results are defined as functionality, ease of use and brand image; the good system alternative is defined as SAP.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Trends in Business and Economics

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.262
Cite : 14.340
2023 Impact : 0.623
Trends in Business and Economics