Özet:

They are those who are witnesses to the revelation and who know his tongue. So they gained a good position in understanding the signs. And if they had understood the general purposes of the verses or the basic commandments and prohibitions of the religion, they had been translated into the sources with some verses about what they had to mean. The discourse of the Sabbath in the tribute has led some scientists and researchers to discourage the nature of this discourse. Therefore, there are two kinds of disputes in the form of the Tenevvuʿ(zahirî) and the Tezatî(s) in the form of the truth. The discrepancies and the concepts of Mescura are basically addressed by the multi-significance of the words or the contradiction of the meanings with each other. This is the cause of the uncertainty, which is the cause of the uncertainty, which is the cause of the uncertainty. Therefore, those who study the subject are also distinguished that in the Nazareth the interpretation of the Sahabe is the argument/true dispute. We think that the facts of conflict should be assessed by criteria such as God’s muracy, the perception of the interlocutor, the time and space unity, the consistency of the results in practice. And when they see the truth, they see the truth. For if they were a witness by their own signs, some reasons have brought them to dispute in the interpretation of the signs.

Özet:

The companions are people who witnessed to sending of revelation and knew its language naturally. Thereby they acquired a privileged position in understanding of the verses correctly. Although they understood general purposes of the verses or basic orders and prohibitions of the religion, their difference (iḫtilāf) about what is meant in some verses/terms (lafẓ) is reported in some sources. Differences of the companions on the tafsir prompted some scholars to scrutinize nature of the difference. As a result, differences are separated into two parts as difference of variation/difference in appearance (iḫtilāf tanawwuʿ/ẓāhirī) and difference of contradiction/real difference (iḫtilāf taḍādd/ḥaqīqī). The differences and concepts are investigated based on polysemy of terms or contradicting meanings with one another. This case brings about an uncertainty in ascertaining whether a difference is contradictory/real or variation/in appearance. Thereby, it differs whether difference of contradictory/real difference is in tafsir of the companions or not in terms of scholars. We think that the differences shouldn’t be investigated based on polysemy or contradicting meanings with one another, rather, they should be analyzed based on criterions like intent of Allah, perception of audience, unity in time and place, consistency of applications in practice. If it is regarded so, the real differences are seen in tafsir of the companions. Although they had witnessed to sending of revelation, some reasons caused them to differ in tafsir of the verses.     

Anahtar Kelimeler: