Hasan Tahsin’in “ilk kurşunu” atarak Millî Mücadeleyi başlattığı tezi tarih anlatımına sonradan eklemlenmiştir. Başta Nutuk olmak üzere Millî Mücadele tarihini anlatan birincil el kaynaklarda “Hasan Tahsin” ve “ilk kurşun” anlatısı yer almaz. Bu çalışma Hasan Tahsin’in “ilk kurşunu” atarak Millî Mücadeleyi başlattığı tezine eleştirel bir yaklaşımla yeniden bakmayı amaçlamaktadır. Tarih biliminin araştırma yöntemlerine uygun olarak öncelikle birinci el kaynaklar taranmıştır. Nitekim Osmanlı arşivinde zengin bir belge içeriği ile karşılaşılmıştır. Ardından konuyla ilgili yabancı arşiv belgelerine başvurulmuş ve son olarak da dönemin Türk basınında yer alan haberler değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. Görgü tanıklarının aktardıkları ise geniş bir literatürü kapsadığı için ayrı makale konusu olarak düşünülmüş ve söz konusu çalışmanın dışında bırakılmıştır.
The thesis that Hasan Tahsin initiated the national struggle by being the first to open fire was later added to historical narrative. The narrative about "Hasan Tahsin" and "the first bullet" can't be found in the primary sources about the history of national struggle, notably in Nutuk. With a critical approach, this study aims to re-examine the thesis that Hasan Tahsin initiated the national struggle by being the first to open fire. According to the historical methods, primary sources were first reviewed. As a matter of fact, a large number of documents were found in the Ottoman archives.Then, foreign archive documents related to the subject were revised, and finally the news in the Turkish press at that time were also investigated. Since eyewitness reports cover an extensive literature, it was considered a separate article subject and was left out of the study.
The thesis that Hasan Tahsin initiated the national struggle by being the first to open fire was later added to historical narrative. The narrative about “Hasan Tahsin” and “the first bullet” can’t be found in the primary sources about the history of national struggle, notably in Nutuk. With a critical approach, this study aims to re-examine the thesis that Hasan Tahsin initiated the national struggle by being the first to open fire. In accordance with the historical methods, primary sources were first reviewed. As a matter of fact, a large number of documents were found in the Ottoman archives.Then, foreign archive documents related to the subject were revised, and finally the news in the Turkish press at that time were also investigated. Since eyewitness reports cover an extensive literature, it was considered a separate article subject and was left out of the study.
Alan : Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|