Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 62
 İndirme 20
İnsan Hakları Bağlamında Demokraside Yargı Denetiminin Kabul Edilebilirliği
2015
Dergi:  
Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi
Yazar:  
Özet:

Human rights globally become an inarguable virtue and it requires the conviction that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity. According to the current dominant paradigm, the protection of human rights is one of the most important obligations of the state. In both national and international level, courts are primarily equipped to protect human rights in any circumstances. On the other hand, democracy representing by the elected parliaments traditionally means decisions by the majority. These two important merits, democracy or parliaments and human rights or courts, interact with each other. Usually the relationship between them is based on the fact that they support each other. However, over the years it is observed that there can be conflicts between them. In this case, the absolute power of majority and the rights of individuals or minorities in democracy may come into collision with each other. At this point the controversial question whether there is a rational and practical reason to give decision-making power to unelected judges rather than to democratic majority or not come to light. This essay focuses on the acceptability of judicial review in democracy and the sufficiency of democratic perspective of human rights

Anahtar Kelimeler:

acceptableness of judicial audit in democracy in the context of human rights
2015
Yazar:  
Özet:

human beings are bathed free and equal suicide according to the current dominant paradigm the protection of human beings is one of the most important violation of the state ın both national and international courts level are primarily equipped with human beings in any circumstances on the other hand democracy attributeing by the logic of traditional means decisions by the majority of these two important merits democracy or human side give or abuse with each other connection to each other relationship between the exception of the failure to accession of the failure to the potential of access to the potential of the latvian power in connection to the potential of the potential of the potential of the potential of the latvian power of accession of the latvian power of accession of the unification of accession of the member of the latvian power of the latvian power of the connection of the potential among countries of accession of access to the latvian partners in connection to access to accession of the unification of accession of the latvian partners among others in connection of the member of accession of the latvian partners of the connection of the potential of the latvian potential of the latvian power of the latvian power of the latvian power of the latvian potential of the latvian power of the latvian power of the latvian power of the latvian power of the connection of

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler








Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi
Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi