Özet:

The first judgments for the applications reviewed by Constitutional Court came in 2012 and these initial judgments were leading judgments given by the Sections to establish the unity of case-law. Most of the judgments given by the Sections for the individual applications to the Constitutional Court are related to the grounds of inadmissibility. The applications which are similar to the leading judgments given by the Sections are concluded by the Commissions. However, if an application is declared admissible, then the review on the merits of the application is carried out by the Sections and it is decided whether a right is violated or not. In the preliminary review of the individual applications, such administrative decisions as separation, joinder of applications and strike off decisions have been given. If it is identified that the application form and its appendices do not bear the conditions set out in the relevant legislation and that such deficiencies are not completed within the time limit specified in the notification sent to the applicants or if the documents requested are not provided in proper method to the Court, then such applications are declared inadmissible on administrative grounds. Similarly, if it is identified that the application is not lodged in due time period, then the application is declared inadmissible on administrative grounds.This study first introduces the individual application system briefly and examines the procedures of registry and review of the application, and then makes an assessment of types of judgments and which units of the Court give such judgments, the judgments given and principles established in the result of the review on merits of the applications as well as the outcomes of these judgments

Anahtar Kelimeler: