Özet:

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate whether there are differences in the diagnosis in the study of tablets and panoramic radiographs from medical monitors and smart screen systems. Tools and Methods: 68 panoramic radiography experience periods were studied by 2 different observers on 3 different screens (Medical monitor, laptop, tablet). In each radiography, 5 anatomical and pathological formations were evaluated (top molar dental dents crush, lower molar dental dents crush, lower molar mine-dents limit, apical inflammatory injury, macular sinus pathology). The results were analyzed using Weight Cap Analysis and ROC Curve Analysis. Results: The evaluation of the dentin fractures and the difference between the mine dentin limits found a strong adjustment in all monitor types. The highest low scores were seen in the medical monitor and the distinction of the mine dentin. The discrepancy of apical inflammatory injury on the tablet screen and the distinction of sinus pathologies showed poor harmony. No statistically significant difference was observed in the assessment of anatomical and pathological structures on any monitor in the scores compared to the control group of observers. Result: Smart screen systems don’t give the exact result as accurate as medical monitors in dental radiology. Keywords Medical monitor, smart screen, diagnostic visualization, diagnosis, panoramic radiography

Anahtar Kelimeler: