User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 3
 Views 17
 Downloands 3
Giresun Bölgesi Deri Prick Testi Sonuçlarının Kapsamlı Analizi
2019
Journal:  
Konuralp Tıp Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Amaç: Giresun’da prick testi yapılmış hastalarda pozitiflik oranını saptamak ve alerjenlerin yaş, cinsiyet, başvuru tanısı ve mevsimlere göre dağılımını incelemek. Yöntemler:  Çalışmaya 12 aylık periyotta deri prick testi yapılan 330 hasta dahil edildi. Test sonuçları retrospektif olarak incelenerek yaşları, cinsiyetleri, ön tanıları, testin hangi mevsimde yapıldığı ve prick testi sonuçları kaydedildi. Pediatrik ve yetişkin hastalar arasında test pozitifliği ve çoklu alerjen pozitifliği açısından karşılaştırma yapıldı. Bulgular: Test yapılan 330 hastadan 92 (%27,9) ’si alerjik rinit, 73 (%22,1) ’ü ürtiker, 59 (%17,9) ‘u kronik öksürük, 50 (%15,1) ‘si kronik pruritus, 25 (%7,6) ’i atopik dermatit,  25 (%7,6) ’i kontakt dermatit ve 6 (%1,8) ‘sı anjionörotik ödem hastasıydı. En sık test pozitifliği sırasıyla anjionörotik ödem (%83,3) alerjik rinit hastalarında (%65,2) bulundu. Hastaların 106 (%66,7)’sında akar pozitifliği (ev tozu ve depo akarları), 44 (%27,7)’ünde çayır ve ot poleni duyarlılığı, 43 (%27)’ünde ise ağaç poleni duyarlılığı saptandı. Alerjik rinit hastalarında en sık ev tozu akarları [D. Pteronyssnus- 33 hasta (%55) ve D. Farinae- 30 hasta (%50)] alerjisi olduğu saptandı. Pediatrik hastalarda en yüksek test pozitifliği alerjik rinit (%72,7) ve atopik dermatit (%50) hastalarındaydı. Çocuk ve yetişkinlerin test pozitifliği ve çoklu alerjen pozitifliği oranları benzerdi (sırasıyla, X2= 0.417, p=0.519 ve X2= 0.383, p=0.536). Sonuç: Giresun’da en sık prick test endikasyonu olarak saptadığımız ön tanı alerjik rinit idi. En yüksek test pozitifliği anjionörotik ödem ve alerjik rinit hastalarındaydı. En sık reaksiyon saptanan alerjen ise ev tozu akarlarıydı.

Keywords:

A comprehensive analysis of the results of the Prick test
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: To detect the positivity ratio of prick test and to investigate the distribution of allergens according to the age, gender, pre-diagnosis and seasons. Methods: In this study, 330 patients undergone skin prick test in 12 months- period were included. Reviewing retrospectively, ages, genders, pre-diagnosis, seasons and results of the prick tests were noted. The ratio of test positivity and multiple allergen positivity were compared between children and adults.  Results: Of 330 patients, 92 (27.9%) had allergic rhinitis, 73 (22.1%) had urticaria, 59 (17.9%) had chronic cough, 50 (15.1%) had chronic pruritus, 25 (7.6%) had atopic dermatitis, 25 (7.6%) had contact dermatitis and 6 (1.8%) had angioneurotic edema. Highest test positivity was evident in angioneurotic edema (83.3%) and allergic rhinitis (65.2%) patients. Of the patients, 106 (66.7%) had mite sensitivity (house dust and warehouse), 44 (27.7%) had meadow and grass pollen sensitivity, and 43 (27%) had tree pollen sensitivity. The most frequent allergen type was house dust myths in allergic rhinitis patients [D. Pteronyssnus (55%) and D. Farinae (50%)]. In children, the highest ratio of test positivity was in allergic rhinitis (72.7%) and atopic dermatitis patients (50%). No difference was evident between the ratio of test positivity and multiple allergen positivity of children and adults (X2=0.417, p=0.519 and X2=0.383, p=0.536; respectively). The most common pre-diagnosis for the prick test was allergic rhinitis. The highest test positivity was in angioneurotic edema and allergic rhinitis patients. The most common type of allergen was house dust mite.

Keywords:

A Comprehensive Analysis Of Skin Prick Test Results From Giresun Region
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: To detect the positivity ratio of prick test and to investigate the distribution of allergens according to the age, gender, pre-diagnosis and seasons in Giresun. Methods: In this study, 330 patients undergone skin prick test in 12 month- period were included. Reviewing retrospectively, ages, genders, pre-diagnosis, seasons and results of the prick tests were noted. Ratio of test positivity and multiple allergen positivity were compared between children and adults.  Results: Of 330 patients, 92 (27.9 %) had allergic rhinitis, 73 (22.1 %) had urticaria, 59 (17.9 %) had chronic cough, 50 (15.1%) had chronic pruritus, 25 (7.6 %) had atopic dermatitis, 25 (7.6 %) had contact dermatitis and 6 (1.8 %) had angioneurotic edema. Highest test positivity was evident in angioneurotic edema (83.3 %) and allergic rhinitis (65.2 %) patients. Of the patients, 106 (66.7 %) had mite sensitivity (house dust and warehouse), 44 (27.7 %) had meadow and grass pollen sensitivity, and 43 (27%) had tree pollen sensitivity. The most frequent allergen type was house dust mites in allergic rhinitis patients [D. Pteronyssnus (55%) and D. Farinae (50%)]. In children, the highest ratio of test positivity was in allergic rhinitis (72.7%) and atopic dermatitis patients (50%). No difference was evident between the ratio of test positivity and multiple allergen positivity of children and adults (X2= 0.417, p=0.519 and X2= 0.383, p=0.536; respectively). Conclusion: The most common pre-diagnosis for prick test was allergic rhinitis. Highest test positivity was in angioneurotic edema and allergic rhinitis patients. The most common allergen type was house dust mite.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










Konuralp Tıp Dergisi

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 769
Cite : 1.217
2023 Impact : 0.006
Konuralp Tıp Dergisi