Özet:

i am trying to show that kuhn’s science philosophy has led to relativizme despite not knowing any universal rational measure on the decision of scientists in the selection of kuhn’s rahn’s science philosophy does not recognize any universal rational metrics, and therefore, if there is a ‘employment’ in the choice of ‘requiet’, and finally, the knowledge in the form of an accumulational and linear scientific progress is not possible, and therefore, if there is a question to respond to quahn relativism crimes, ‘i’ would not be able to say that there is a good example of the pronunciation of the pronunciation of ‘facy’ in the fact that there is not to say that there is not to say that there is not to say that there is not to say that it would be a good idea of the question of a ‘recymic’ in the fact that there is not to say that it would be a fundamentality of the fact that it would be a ‘exist’ in the fact that it’ in the questioning to be a fundamentality of the fact that it would be a good idea of the questionable’ in the question of