Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
Kurumsal Referanslarımız SED Quartile İstatistik S.S.S. Kullanım Kılavuzu Bize Ulaşın
Kurumsal Başvuru Dergi Başvurusu
Türkçe English
  1. DergiPark
  2. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
  3. Arşiv
  4. Cilt 16, Sayı 3
Yıl 2013, Cilt 16 , Sayı 3, Sayfalar 181 - 187 2013-03-19

Nazal kavite ve osteomeatal kompleks anatomik varyasyonları

Akif SUMBULLU [1] , Oguzhan ALTUN [2] , Dogan DURNA [3] , Binali CAKUR [4]

Öz

Objectives: The maxillary sinuses are importantanatomical structures for dental procedures indentistry. The normal function of the sinuses iseffective in the success of these dental procedures.The continuation of the normal functions of theparanasal sinuses, the maxillary and osteomeatalcomplex (OMC) has an important role. In thisstudy, we aimed to investigate the frequency ofosteomeatal complex anatomic variations withcone-beam computed tomography.Material and Methods: In this retrospectivestudy, in cone-beam computed topographies of 280patients (154 men, 126 women), anatomicvariations of paranasal sinuses (deviated septum,inferior turbinate hypertrophy, concha bullosa,paradoxical middle turbinate, Agger nasi, Haller’scell, Onodi cell, pneumatized uncinate process(uncinate bulla), pneumatized crista galli,pneumatized septum) were analyzed.Results: In our study, septal deviation 85%;inferior turbinate hypertrophy 48.6%; middleconcha bullosa 40%; Agger nasi cells 28.6%;Haller’s cells 9.6%; pneumatized septum 4.6%;paradoxical middle turbinate 2.5%; pneumatizeduncinate process 2.5%; pneumatized crista galli1.4%; Onodi %1.1 were found.Conclusion: Variations of the osteomeatalcomplex due to the effect of the paranasal sinusesshould be considered in maxillary dental implantplanning.

Objectives: The maxillary sinuses are important anatomical structures for dental procedures in dentistry. The normal function of the sinuses is effective in the success of these dental procedures. The continuation of the normal functions of the paranasal sinuses, the maxillary and osteomeatal complex (OMC) has an important role. In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of osteomeatal complex anatomic variations with cone-beam computed tomography.

Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, in cone-beam computed topographies of 280 patients (154 men, 126 women), anatomic variations of paranasal sinuses (deviated septum, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, concha bullosa, paradoxical middle turbinate, Agger nasi, Haller’s cell, Onodi cell, pneumatized uncinate process (uncinate bulla), pneumatized crista galli, pneumatized septum) were analyzed.

Results: In our study, septal deviation 85%; inferior turbinate hypertrophy 48.6%; middle concha bullosa 40%; Agger nasi cells 28.6%; Haller’s cells 9.6%; pneumatized septum 4.6%; paradoxical middle turbinate 2.5%; pneumatized uncinate process 2.5%; pneumatized crista galli 1.4%; Onodi %1.1 were found.

Conclusion: Variations of the osteomeatal complex due to the effect of the paranasal sinuses should be considered in maxillary dental implant planning.

Keywords: Anatomic variation, osteomeatal complex, cone-beam computed tomography.

 

  1. DergiPark
  2. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
  3. Arşiv
  4. Cilt 16, Sayı 3
Yıl 2013, Cilt 16 , Sayı 3, Sayfalar 181 - 187 2013-03-19

Nazal kavite ve osteomeatal kompleks anatomik varyasyonları

Akif SUMBULLU [1] , Oguzhan ALTUN [2] , Dogan DURNA [3] , Binali CAKUR [4]

Öz

Objectives: The maxillary sinuses are importantanatomical structures for dental procedures indentistry. The normal function of the sinuses iseffective in the success of these dental procedures.The continuation of the normal functions of theparanasal sinuses, the maxillary and osteomeatalcomplex (OMC) has an important role. In thisstudy, we aimed to investigate the frequency ofosteomeatal complex anatomic variations withcone-beam computed tomography.Material and Methods: In this retrospectivestudy, in cone-beam computed topographies of 280patients (154 men, 126 women), anatomicvariations of paranasal sinuses (deviated septum,inferior turbinate hypertrophy, concha bullosa,paradoxical middle turbinate, Agger nasi, Haller’scell, Onodi cell, pneumatized uncinate process(uncinate bulla), pneumatized crista galli,pneumatized septum) were analyzed.Results: In our study, septal deviation 85%;inferior turbinate hypertrophy 48.6%; middleconcha bullosa 40%; Agger nasi cells 28.6%;Haller’s cells 9.6%; pneumatized septum 4.6%;paradoxical middle turbinate 2.5%; pneumatizeduncinate process 2.5%; pneumatized crista galli1.4%; Onodi %1.1 were found.Conclusion: Variations of the osteomeatalcomplex due to the effect of the paranasal sinusesshould be considered in maxillary dental implantplanning.

Objectives: The maxillary sinuses are important anatomical structures for dental procedures in dentistry. The normal function of the sinuses is effective in the success of these dental procedures. The continuation of the normal functions of the paranasal sinuses, the maxillary and osteomeatal complex (OMC) has an important role. In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of osteomeatal complex anatomic variations with cone-beam computed tomography.

Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, in cone-beam computed topographies of 280 patients (154 men, 126 women), anatomic variations of paranasal sinuses (deviated septum, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, concha bullosa, paradoxical middle turbinate, Agger nasi, Haller’s cell, Onodi cell, pneumatized uncinate process (uncinate bulla), pneumatized crista galli, pneumatized septum) were analyzed.

Results: In our study, septal deviation 85%; inferior turbinate hypertrophy 48.6%; middle concha bullosa 40%; Agger nasi cells 28.6%; Haller’s cells 9.6%; pneumatized septum 4.6%; paradoxical middle turbinate 2.5%; pneumatized uncinate process 2.5%; pneumatized crista galli 1.4%; Onodi %1.1 were found.

Conclusion: Variations of the osteomeatal complex due to the effect of the paranasal sinuses should be considered in maxillary dental implant planning.

Keywords: Anatomic variation, osteomeatal complex, cone-beam computed tomography.

 

Menü