Özet:

In the first years of Islam's spread, the local peoples living in various places, which led to religious and spiritual, historical and cultural discussions of many peoples, were targeted to a dispute in terms of traditions, world views and spiritual values. It is clear that the nations that accept Islam are involved in the Muslim community with their own religious and aesthetic principles, opinions, culture, traditions and legal system. Therefore, the Islamic religion has been adopted in various peoples with different conditions and has a unique color. In the study, many researchers have sought to answer the questions about how the representatives of the Tasavvuf taricates in Central Asia (Yesevilik and Nakshibendiya) can put their own doctrines and practices in the Islamic Charity, which doctrines of them are being criticized in the Orthodox Islam, how the mutasavvuf shakhs are reacting to those criticisms, and the data related to it have been reviewed. Themes discussed by the representatives of Yeshevilik and Hacegan / Nakşibendiyye tarikatı have been discussed and the procedures of legitimation and solutions of religious acts have been investigated. There are criticisms and criticisms of the Cehr-i Zikre. Criticism usually covers two subjects. The first is the criticism of the theories and prayers used in the public cehr-i memories, and the second is the criticism of the theories and prayers used in the public cehr-i memories. Both sides have proved their views with the Qur’an verses and the Messengers’ hadits. The study also discussed the types and characteristics of the cehr-i memories related to the Yesevi taricate. Keywords: Islam, Tasavvuf, Yesevi Ecology, Zikir, Legalization, Religious Debate, Debate, Time.