Özet:

For a long time in the history of philosophical thought, the approach to nature and to the creatures outside of man has mostly been based on “human-centered” thoughts. Thus, the "man" thought could express itself only in the difference between man and animal. With time, these human-centric approaches have replaced new ideas, especially the concepts of identity and violence have been re-interpreted through the "other" formations of animals, the "animal formation" philosophy has become a matter of itself, and the ecological visibility in literary texts has also begun to attract more attention. In his studies on the animal question, Derrida points to the concept of "logosantrizm" that the animal is considered unintelligent. The absence of language, the absence of speech, the absence of speech and the absence of speech, continues to be a common characteristic of all kinds of community, not only of the animal, but of all kinds of community that man can take to the "other" position. The origins of the thoughts of names such as Derrida, Heidegger, Agamben include the idea of the multi-worlds by biologist Jakob von Uexküll, where the perception of space, time and world is formed according to the world of perception of each animal. The wise Karasu also discussed in his texts the visibility of nature, the differences and intersection between man and animal, the state of being "the other" or being "the other" in his own word in various contexts and made it part of his literary poetry. Karasu has questioned the existence and identity of the animal in his texts, the position in which it is "the other/the other" and has given the answer to many questions about man through this other. In his texts, the author wants to build his view of nature and - as part of it - the animals, by cleansing from the relationship of violence and persecution in a way that is not human-centric, and seeks ways to this. Based on Karasu’s two stories, the author’s world difference between humans and animals, logosantrization approach and the demand for equality between animals will be addressed.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Özet:

Throughout the history of philosophical thinking, human centred thoughts are based on the approaches to nature and the living other than human. However, “human” could only express itself via the difference between animal and human. Over time, human centred approaches have been replaced by new studies about animal’s being the “other” with the concept of identity. “Being animal” has been a philosophical problem and it has attracted more attention in literary texts. In his studies on the question of animal, Derrida emphasises the concept of logocentrism and impression of animal’s lack of word and mind in a position of “the other.” Jakob von Uexküll’s idea of multiple worlds in which the perceptions of time, place and world are shaped in the senses of each living creature is grounded with the thoughts of Derrida, Heidegger and Agamben. In his works, Bilge Karasu has handled the visibility junctions between human and animal and the situation of being the “other” and made them parts of his poetics. Karasu, has questioned the identity of animal, its position as the “other/different” and answered many humanly questions via this otherness. He wishes to determine the ways of maintaining his approach to nature and animal in not a human centred way by clearing of every relation of domination. In this study, based on the two short stories of Karasu, the author’s approach to the criticism of logocentrism; and his demand of absolute equality among the living will be studied.