The subject of economic securitization is the satisfaction and security of the economic interests of an country. A. Smith, the founder of the doctrine of Classical Economics, indicates that the security comes before welfare. While the threat subjects and perceptions are changing in “g-localization” world, the economic securitization or desecuritization appears to be open-ended processes. At this point, Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries (Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Syria, etc.) which is the most unstable but one of the richest region in the world and Turkey as one of the emerging markets come to mind. MENA is a boiling pot that similar to scalding hot and some countries have tried to gain from this situation. The pot is too big, its contents are too complex and there is a fire which is no blinking. Turkey, who also take part in this boiler, sometimes a scoop position is also looking for stability and peace. One of the problems is concerning both the pot and the spoon is economic securitization. Among the components of this problem there are protection of local property of natural resources, immigration control, energy distribution security, land-based trade, terrorism, etc. In this study, the concept of economic (de)securitization has discussed in the background of the MENA, in light of various safety doctrines (Copenhagen, etc.)
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|