Views
11
Downloands
4
Bu çalışmada amacımız, Nedîm’in “mısın kâfir” redifli gazelini klasik şerh metoduyla inceledikten sonra 20. yüzyılda ortaya çıkmış ve hayatın her alanında kendini göstermiş olan yapısalcılık yöntemiyle irdelemek ve gazelin gizli kalmış yanlarını yapısalcılık metoduyla ortaya çıkarmaktır. Yapısalcılık ekolü, metni oluşturan en küçük yapı taşlarını irdeledikten sonra, bu yapılar arasındaki anlamsal ilişkileri saptar ve bütüne uygulamayı amaç edinir. Bu yöntemle yapısalcılık ekolü metni sadece irdelemekle kalmaz aynı zamanda irdelenen metnin daha anlaşılır olmasına da olanak sağlar. Parçadan bütüne doğru ilerleyen yöntem, gazelin yapısal, anlamsal, sanatsal, gramatikal ve estetik değerinin saptanmasına yardımcı olur. Araştırmacı tarafından incelenmeden önce yapısalcılığa uygun olarak gazelin yapısal bir iskelesi çıkartılmış, incelenecek konular belirlemiştir. Bu yapısal iskele, incelenecek metnin yapısalcılığın dışına çıkmaması için önem arz eder. İnceleme konuları gazeli ilgilendiren dış etkenlerden çok gazelin içeriğiyle alakalıdır. Gazelin incelemesinde yapı iskelesini biçim, uyak, gazelde kullanılan diller ve yabancı kelimeler, tamlama türleri ve terkipleri, cümle yapıları, harf türleri, şahıs zamirleri ve kipler, içeriği oluşturan anlam planı, imaleler ve vasıllar oluşturmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular tablolar ve grafikler aracılığıyla şarih tarafından yorumlanarak anlamlandırılmıştır.
In this study, our goal is to explore the redirected gazeline of Nedim with the classic sherh method, which appeared in the 20th century and has manifested itself in all areas of life, and to reveal the hidden sides of gazeline with the method of structuralism. The structural ecole, after wrapping the smallest structural stones that make up the text, identifies the meaningful relationships between these structures and aims to apply to the whole. This method of structurality not only enables the text to be refined, but also makes the text refined more understandable. The method that moves from a piece to a whole helps to determine the structural, meaningful, artistic, grammatical and aesthetic value of gazeline. Before the researchers were examined, a structural skeleton of gazeline was extracted in accordance with the structurality, determined the topics to be studied. This structural scale is important to ensure that the text to be studied is not out of the structurality. Examination issues are more related to the content of gasoline than external factors concerned with gasoline. In the study of Gazelin, the structure is formed by the shape, sleep, the languages and foreign words used in the gazel, the types of completion and remnants, the phrase structures, the type of letters, the personal emirates and quils, the meaning plan that forms the content, the manufacture and the vasils. The findings obtained are interpreted by the story through tables and graphs.
In this study, our aim is to examine Nedîm's ghazal with the redif “misin kâfir” with the classical commentary method, then to examine it with the Structuralism method, which emerged in the 20th century and showed itself in all areas of life, and to reveal the hidden aspects of the ghazal with the Structuralism method. The school of structuralism determines the semantic relations between these structures after grating the smallest building blocks that make up the text and aims to apply them to the whole. With this medhod, the school of structuralism not only examines the text, but also enables the stuedied text to be more understandable. The method, which progresses from part to whole, helps to determine the structural, semantic, artistic, grammatical and aesthetic value of the ghazal. Before being examined by the researcher, a structural scaffold of the ghazal was drawn up in accordance with structuralism and the subjects to be examined were determined. This structural scaffold is important so that the text to be analyzed does not go beyond structuralism. The subjects of examination are related to the content of the ghazal rather that the external factors concerning the ghazal. Form, rhyme, languages and foreign words used in the ghazal, phrase types and compositions, sentence structures, letter types, personal pronouns and moods, semantic plan that make up the content, allusions and words formed the scaffolding in the study of the ghazal. The findings were interpreted by the commentator through tables and graphs.
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
