User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 5
 Downloands 1
The Effect of Education, Telephone Monitoring on Self-Efficacy and Shock Anxiety of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients
2023
Journal:  
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), which are used in the treatment of fatal ventricular arrhythmias, have many life-saving benefits. On the other hand, it has negative effects in terms of physical, social and psychological aspects by commonly causing anxiety and depression. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of education and telephone monitoring on self-efficacy and shock anxiety in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. Methods: 65 patients hospitalized for ICD insertion were randomly divided into intervention (n=33) and control (n=32) groups. The intervention group was given a training booklet prepared by one-on-one training about ICD. Telephone monitoring was performed once every two weeks for three months and then once a month. No intervention was applied to the control group. Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectation Scales, Florida Shock Anxiety Scale were applied in the third and sixth months after ICD implantation in both groups. Results: The self-efficacy scores at the sixth month were higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p=.03). There was no difference between the shock anxiety scores at 3 months (p=.58) and 6 months (p=.64) between the groups. Shock anxiety mean scores of both groups in the 6th month are lower than the mean scores in the 3rd month (p<.01). It was found that self-efficacy and outcome expectation scores decreased as shock anxiety scores increased. Conclusion: It was determined that the intervention increased the level of self-efficacy and did not make a difference in terms of and shock anxiety. It should be aimed to reduce shock anxiety and accompanying physical problems by supporting patients with various nursing interventions that will increase self-efficacy during adjustment periods.

Keywords:

0
2023
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 949
Cite : 1.421
2023 Impact : 0.046
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences