User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 42
 Downloands 24
TEK PARTİ DÖNEMİNDE CHP’NİN TAŞRA ÖRGÜTLERİNDE GÜÇ VE İKTİDAR MÜCADELESİ: MARAŞLI KADIZÂDE AİLESİ
2019
Journal:  
Asia Minor Studies
Author:  
Abstract:

Tek Parti Döneminde tek parti mantığına uygun olarak yürütülen merkez-çevre ilişkilerinde taşradaki parti merkezleri, yerel güçlerin merkeze ulaşma konusundaki en önemli noktalarını teşkil etmekteydi. Bu dönemde kırsal yapıya uygun olarak taşranın siyaset yapıcıları da bir nevi kitlelerin liderliğini üstlenen eşraf temsilcileri olmuştu. Şehrin ve yörenin ileri gelenleri üstlendikleri hami rolü ile taşrada siyasetin tek temsilcisi durumuna gelmişti. Parti örgütlerini kendi sosyo-ekonomik güçlerini bütünleyen bir siyasi kanat olarak kullanan bu yerel güçler, parti merkezine hoş görünmek ve mevcut siyasi ve toplumsal gücünü garantiye almak için ciddi mücadeleler vermişlerdir. Kitlelerin mecburi sessizliği karşısında, rakip görülen yerel güçler arasındaki bu mücadeleler, bir siyasi rant elde etme aracına dönüşmüştür. Birçok taşra kentinde olduğu gibi Maraş’ta da büyük ve zengin aileler elinde yürütülen parti siyaseti, çoğu zaman derin uyuşmazlık ve anlaşmazlıklara sebep olmuştur. Bu dönemde Maraş’ta yerel siyasetin temel yapıcısı konumunda bulunan Kadızâde ailesi, rakipleri tarafından sürekli eleştiri altında tutulmuş ve parti merkezinin irdelemesi sonucu iktidardan düşürülmüştür. Tek Parti Döneminin bir taşra kentindeki parti idaresini ele geçirme mücadelesini ele alan bu çalışmada; kırsal bir kent yapılanmasına sahip olan Maraş’ın CHP teşkilatında ortaya çıkan parti mücadeleleri ve bunun alt yapısında yer alan sosyo-kültürel sebeplerin irdelemesi yapılacaktır. Bu perspektifkten hareketle çalışmanın asıl dayanağını parti müfettiş raporları oluşturmuştur. Tek Parti Döneminde CHP’nin taşradaki parti teşkilatlarının yapısal durumunu ve örgütlenme açısından bir tahlilini sunan parti müfettişlerinin teftiş raporları, taşra kentlerindeki sosyo-ekonomik durumu ve parti örgütlerindeki iç mücadelelerinde bir fotoğrafını sunmaktadır. Kadızâde ailesi örneği üzerinde yapılan bu makale çalışması ile tek parti idaresinde partinin taşra örgütü içinde meydana gelen çekişmelere, bu çekişmelerin yapısal sebeplerine, tek parti idaresi altında parti merkezi ve parti örgütlerinin ilişki ağının niteliğine, taşrada siyaseti yürüten ve olgunlaştıran temel etmenlerin neler olduğuna değinilecektir. Çalışmanın varmayı beklediği temel sonuç ise parti mücadelelerinin tek parti idaresinin tek ve en kudretli siyasi mekanizmasında yer edinebilmek amacıyla gerçekleştirildiği tespiti olacaktır.

Keywords:

In the only part of the party, the struggle of power and power in the stone of the CHP: the family of MARAŞLI KADIZADA
2019
Journal:  
Asia Minor Studies
Author:  
Abstract:

In central-province relations conducted in accordance with single-party ideology in the single-party period, provincial party centers were the most important points of local powers in reaching the center. In this regard, rural gentry became the political constructors the provincial system as the representatives of the masses. The leading figures of the region became the representative of politics in the provinces. These local forces, who used party organizations as a political wing that integrates their socio-economic forces, struggled to guarantee their existing political and social power. In the face of the compulsory silence of the masses, the struggle between the rival local forces turned into a means of obtaining political rant. As in many provincial cities, party politics, which were conducted by large and wealthy families, often led to deep conflicts and disagreements in Maras. In this process, the Kadızâde family, which was the main constructor of local politics in Maras, was hardly criticized by their rivals and was overthrown by the party center. This study deals with the struggle to seize party administration in a provincial city during the Single Party Period. This study also deals with the emergence of struggles in the provincial organization of RPP in Maras and their socio-cultural reasons. From this perspective, this study is based on the party inspector reports. The party inspector reports, presented the structural status and organization of the party organizations in the provincial provinces, at the same time present a photograph of the socio-economic situation in the provincial cities and their internal struggles in the party organizations. This article based on the Kadızâde family case discusses the conflicts occurred in the provincial organization of the RPP and their reasons as well as the nature of the network of the party center and party organizations under single party administration, and the main factors that conduct and mature politics in the provinces in the single-party period. Thus, it can be said that the main purpose of this study is to determine the party struggles occured in order to take part in the single and most powerful political mechanism of the single party administration.

Keywords:

Political Power Struggles In The Provincial Organization Of The Rpp During The Single Party Period : The Case Of Kadizâde Family In Maras
2019
Journal:  
Asia Minor Studies
Author:  
Abstract:

In central-province  relations conducted in accordance with single-party ideology in the single-party period, provincial party centers were the most important points of local powers in reaching the center. In this regard, rural gentry became  the political constructors the provincial system as the representatives of the masses. The leading figures of the region became the representative of politics in the provinces. These local forces, who  used party organizations as a political wing that integrates their socio-economic forces, struggled to guarantee their existed political and social power. In the face of the obligatory silence of the masses, the struggle between the rival local forces turned into a means of obtaining political rant. As in many provincial cities, party politics, which were  conducted by large and wealthy families, often led to deep conflicts and disagreements in Maras. In this process, the Kadızâde family, which was the main constructor of local politics in Maras, was hardly criticized by their rivals and was overthrown by the party center. This study deals with the struggle to seize party administration in a provincial city  during the Single Party Period. This study also deals with the emergence of struggles in the provincial organization of RPP in Maras and their socio-cultural reasons. From this perspective, this study  is based on the party inspector reports. The party inspector reports, presented the structural status and organization of the party organizations in the provincial provinces, at the same time presents a photograph of the socio-economic situation in the provincial cities and their internal struggles in the party organizations. This article based on the Kadızâde family case discusses the conflicts ocurred in the provincial organization of the RPP and their reasons as well as the nature of the network of the party center and party organizations under single party administration, and the main factors that conduct and mature politics in the provinces in the single-party period. Thus, İt can be said that the main purpose of this study is to determinate the party struggles  occured in order to take part in the single and most powerful political mechanism of the single party administration.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles




Asia Minor Studies

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 198
Cite : 360
2023 Impact : 0.05
Asia Minor Studies