Bu çalışmada, birbirinden farklı dini toplulukların iddialarını anlama çabasında olan, onlarla sağlıklı diyalog kurma örneği olarak Bîrûnî’nin Tahkîk ma li’l-Hind adlı eserindeki avam ve havas ayrımı şeklindeki metodu incelenecektir. Bîrûnî’nin ötekini anlamadaki özgün yöntemi olarak nitelendirdiğimiz avam- havas ayrımına gitme nedenlerini örnekler üzerinde tartışacağız. Bu çalışma sona erdiğinde, bu metodun objektifliğinin, avantaj ve dezavantajlarının neler olduğu sorusuna cevap bulmayı amaçlıyoruz. Bu soruyu felsefî analiz ve güncel karşılaştırmalarla zenginleştirerek metodolojik açıdan tartışacağız. Dışarıya kapalı toplumlarla iletişim kurulabilmesinde bu metodun işlevselliğini göstermiş olacağız.
In this study, the method in the form of the avam and air distinction in the work of Tahkîk mâ li'l-Hind will be studied as an example of a healthy dialogue with them, which is trying to understand the claims of different religious communities. We will discuss the reasons for going to the avam-havas distinction that we describe as the original method of understanding the rest of the Qur’an. When this study is completed, we aim to find answers to the question of what the objectivity, advantages and disadvantages of this method are. We will discuss this question from a methodological point of view by enriching it with philosophical analysis and current comparisons. We will be able to demonstrate the functionality of this method when communicating with closed communities.
In this article, al-Biruni’s method of division of the commons and the educated in his Tahqîq mâ li 1-Hind will be examined as a way of establishing a healthy dialogue with different religious communities in an effort to understand their beliefs. We will discuss the reasons why al-Biruni distinguishes betvveen the commons and the educated which we describe as al-Biruni’s distinctive method in understanding the other. When this worlc comes to an end, we aim to find an answer to the question of what the advantages, disadvantages, and objec- tivity of this method are. We will examine this question from a methodological point of view by enriching it with philosophical analysis and current compari- sons. We will have shown the functionality of this method in order to communi- cate with other closed societies.
Alan : İlahiyat; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|