User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 30
 Downloands 6
Indicators of E-Learning Platforms in Riyadh City Universities: A Comparative Study
2015
Journal:  
International Review of Management and Business Research (IRMBR)
Author:  
Abstract:

Developing universities have established a promising E-Learning Platform initiative in order to enhance access to education services and information to its students. This study examines the development of ELearning Platform in Riyadh City Universities (RCU), and compared between privet and government sector. This paper proposes evaluate and comparative model for E-Learning platform between Government and private sector in RCU, the E-Learning platform solution selection is a multiple criteria decisionmaking problem that needs to be addressed objectively taking into consideration the relative weights of the criteria for university. We formulate the quoted multi criteria problem as a decision hierarchy to solving problem. In this paper we will show the general evaluation strategy and compared between privet and government sector obtained results using our model to evaluate e-learning platforms. The results of comparison models are outlined as follows: Total weights of the proposed framework in management feature is 16.25/25, in collaborative feature is 7.75/10, in adaption learning path is 7.63/10 and in interactive learning object is 4.75/5. In this study an evaluation model was applied on Government University like KSU, IMAMU, NAUSS and PNBAU, Private University like PSU, DAU, YU and FU. Then, the results were compared with each other. The total weighs Government University of KSU was 41. While the total weights of IMAMU, NAUSS and PNBAU was 37, 32and 37. The total weighs private University of FU was 40. While the total weights of PSU DAU and YU was 38, 38 and36 respectively. The total weights of all features in Government University are 147/200, Private University are 152/200. Key Words: E-Learning, E-Learning Platform, LCMS, GIS, AHP, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, LMS, GS, PS.

Keywords:

0
2015
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








International Review of Management and Business Research (IRMBR)

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 927
Cite : 436
International Review of Management and Business Research (IRMBR)