Özet:

Habsburg and the Ottoman states have been in political, diplomatic and cultural relations for centuries. The Greek Rebellion (1821–29) and the Mehmet Ali Pasha Rebellion (1831–41), which occurred in the Ottoman territory together with the 19th century, instantly sat on the agenda of all Europe, and after Napoleon, in particular Metternich (1773–1859), all the stones of the European order, which was attempted to re-establish with the great efforts of Metternich (1773–1859). In accordance with the 1815 Congress System, in order to preserve the present European order, in the idea of supporting all monarchs against innovative and separatist currents and initiatives, the Ottoman State, which is a monarchy, must also be supported by the European monarchs. In this period, the state policy of Metternich's attitude towards the Ottoman has become a significant variable in the Song politics and this topic has attracted the attention of historians as one of the important headlines of political history. But the questions about how Metternich's views about the Ottoman State were formed and from which sources he was fed remained in the background. Metternich's decisions have a great influence by his consultant Friedrich von Gentz (1764-1832) . But who or who is informing and guiding Gentz who has no personal interaction with the Ottoman State and who has no education in this? On the other hand, is the Habsburg State's Song policy adopted or criticized by the sharkists of the time? For the answer to all these questions, it is necessary to look at the views, the differences and even the discussions of the charismatics of the time on the subject. In this study, in particular, Gentz, Anton Prokesch von Osten (1795-1876), Franz von Ottenfels-Gschwind (1778-1851) and Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall (1774-1856) took advantage of the works, memoirs and letters and political articles they published in the magazines and newspapers of the time. In the first half of the century the discussions behind the curtain of the Habsburg State's Song policy will be attempted to be understood.

Özet:

For centuries, the Habsburg and Ottoman Empires have been in political, diplomatical and cultural relations. The Greek Revolt (1821-29) and the Rebellion of Mehmet Ali Pasha (1831-41), which broke out in the Ottoman Empire, suddenly had been an agenda topic of Europe. And after Napoleon, the European order that Metternich (1773-1859) tried to reestablish with great efforts, turned upside down. Due to the consensus in the 1815 Congress System, to preserve the existing European order, the Ottoman Empire, which was a monarchy, had to be supported by the European monarchies. In this period Metternich's state policy in favor of Ottoman Empire was an important variable in Oriental politics and this issue has attracted the attention of historians as one of the important topics of political history. But the questions, how Metternich's views on the Ottoman Empire formed and from which sources originated, remained in the background. In Metternich’s decisions, his adviser, Friedrich von Gentz (1764-1832) had a great influence. But who does inform Gentz, who has no personal interaction with the Ottoman Empire and no education on this subject? On the other hand, is the Oriental politics of the Habsburg Empire adopted or criticized by the orientalists of the time? For all these questions, it is necessary to look at the perspectives of the orientalists of the period, their disagreements and even their debates. In this study we will try to understand the backroom discussions about the Oriental politics of the Habsburg State in the first half of the nineteenth century, especially with the help of Gentz’s, Anton Prokesch von Osten’s (1795-1876), Franz von Ottenfels-Gschwind’s (1778-1851) and Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall’s (1774-1856) works, memoirs and letters, and their papers in the periodicals and newspapers. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: