Citation Number
3
Views
44
Downloands
22
Öz: Bu çalışma Ebu Hamid el- Gazzâlî ’nin (505/1111) akıl-nakil ilişkisine dair görüşlerini içeren bir değerlendirme yapmayı amaçlar. İslam ekollerinin akıl-nakil temelli bu çatışması, İslam âkaid mezheplerinin çift kutuplu bir görünüm almasındaki en önemli sebeplerden biri olduğu varsayılır. Gazzâlî, İslami ilimlerin hemen her alanında eser veren oldukça üretken bir XII. Yüzyıl âlimi olarak, akıl-nakil konusunda bir tutum takınmış ve bu tavrı sebebiyle de sonraki kuşaklara tesir etmiştir. O, konuya ilişkin bu tutumu sebebiyle sonraki dönemler üzerinde önemli etkilerde bulunmuş bir bilim insanı olmuştur. Bu yüzden onun konuya yaklaşımını ve bu yaklaşımın gerekçelerini ortaya koymak gerekmiştir. Çünkü Gazzâlî, bir yönüyle kendinden önceki geleneğin bir temsilcisidir, diğer yandan ise yenilenmeyi temsil eden bir âlimdir. Bu yüzden onun konuya ilişkin yaklaşımı geleneğin şekillenmesi anlamında daha fazla önemlidir. Bu çalışmada kısmen karşılaştırmalı bir dil kullanılacak; yeri geldikçe başka İslam ekol ve âlimlerinin akıl-nakil ilişkisine ilişkin görüşleri de metne yansıyacaktır. Karşılaştırmadaki amacımız onun alana getirdiği yeniliklerin daha belirgin biçimde ortaya çıkmasını sağlamaya dönük olacaktır.
This study aims to make an assessment of the views of Abu Hamid al-Gazali (505/1111) on the intellectual relationship. It is assumed that this conflict based on the mind and mind of the Islamic ecologists is one of the most important reasons for the Islamic ecologists to take a double-pole appearance. It is a very productive XII that works in almost every field of Islamic sciences. As a century winner, he had an attitude on the mind-nakil, and for this attitude, he also had the following generations. He was a scientist who had significant influence on the subsequent periods due to this attitude towards the subject. Therefore, it is necessary to reveal his approach to the subject and the reasons for this approach. For the Gazzali is, in one way, a representative of the tradition before him, and in the other way, a representative of the renewal. That is why his approach to the subject is more important in the sense of the formation of the tradition. In this study, a comparative language will be used in part; as the place comes, the views of other Islamic ecols and allies on the intellectual-national relationship will also be reflected in the text. Our aim in the comparison will be to ensure that the innovations he brings to the field appear more clearly.
Abstract: This study aims to make an assessment of Abu Hamid al-Ghazâlî's views on the subject of "reason " - " religious text ". Because the conflict of "reason" - "religious text" is assumed to be one of the most important reasons for the Islamic theological sects to have a bipolar appearance. Al-Ghazâlî is a very productive scholar who writes in almost all fields of Islamic sciences and is therefore a popular as a scholar of the century XII., he took an attitude and took an approach in this regard. His attitude influenced subsequent generations. Due to his attitude and approach to the subject, he is a scholar who has had important effects on later periods. Therefore, it was necessary to reveal his approach to the subject and the rationale for this approach Because al-Ghazali is, on the one hand, a representative of the tradition before him, on the other hand he is a scholar who represents renewal. Therefore, his approach to the issue is more important in shaping tradition. Partially comparative language will be used in this study; The opinions of other schools and scholars of Islam on the relationship between mind and transmission will be reflected in the text as appropriate. Our purpose in comparison will be to ensure that the innovations it brings to the field are more prominent.
Field : Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik; İlahiyat; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
