Abstract:

The meaning and value of the existence of man as a being varies depending on ontological perspectives. Each ontological query corresponds to a positioning of a human dimension and creates its own knowledge, politics, ethics and social philosophy. The emphasis of the idealism that is based on the reality is the emphasis of the realism that is based on the reality on the real sphere while the emphasis of the realism is the object. But in both, reality has an ontological root. But in the phase of hyper-reality, it is impossible to talk about such a root. The appearances of an existence that is not related to the process or substance and the styles of existence have changed, and the questions about man and man have to be re-evaluated. in the work g. From Berkeley’s subjective idealism, the forms of existence that change from modern age to digital age and how the human existence is defined in this historical flow, in God’s practice, in the state practice, and in how the digital master existence positioned man as a being. This study concludes that the emphasis on human existence as "know-of-the-country" turns into "know-of-the-country", that the ontological roots of essence and object distinction are lost, and that in this context the capacity of man is violated.