User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 17
 Downloands 1
John Searle’ün Bilinç Teorisinde Zihinsel Nedensellik Problemi
2022
Journal:  
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy
Author:  
Abstract:

Bazı zihin felsefecileri indirgemeci olmayan fizikalist zihin teorilerinin bilinç ile fiziksel dünya arasındaki nedensel etkileşimi açıklayamayacağını iddia eder. Problem, fiziksel süreçlere indirgenemeyen bilincin, fizik yasalarını ihlal etmeden fiziksel dünya ile nasıl etkileşime girdiğini açıklamakla ilgilidir. John Searle Biyolojik Doğalcılık olarak adlandırdığı zihin teorisinde indirgemeci olmayan bir tutum sergilerken aynı zamanda zihinsel nedensellik problemini çözdüğünü iddia eder. Bu çalışmada amacım Searle’ün zihinsel nedensellik problemine önerdiği çözümü değerlendirmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda ilk olarak zihinsel nedenselliğin ne olduğu ve nasıl anlaşıldığına değineceğim. Ardından konuyla ilgili problemin genel bir çerçevesini çizerek indirgemeci olmayan fizikalistlere yöneltilen spesifik eleştirileri ele alacağım. Son olarak ise bahsi geçen eleştirileri göz önüne bulundurarak Searle’ün zihinsel nedensellik açıklamasının hangi koşullar altında doğru kabul edilebileceğini göstereceğim.

Keywords:

John Searle's Theory of Consciousness
2022
Author:  
Abstract:

Some mind philosophers claim that non-indignative physicalist mind theories cannot explain the causal interaction between consciousness and the physical world. The problem is about explaining how consciousness, which cannot be reduced to physical processes, interacted with the physical world without violating the laws of physics. John Searle claims that he has solved the problem of mental causality while demonstrating an unreductive attitude in the theory of mind he calls biological naturalism. In this study, my goal is to evaluate the solution Searle suggested to the mental cause problem. For this purpose, I will first point out what the mental causality is and how it is understood. Then I will draw a general framework of the issue on the subject and address specific criticisms directed to non-indignative physicists. Finally, taking into account the criticisms mentioned, I will show in which circumstances Searle's mental causal explanation can be accepted correctly.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 543
Cite : 853
2023 Impact : 0.042
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy