User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 3
 Views 60
 Downloands 34
Analysis of Differential Item Functioning of PISA 2015 Mathematics Subtest Subject to Gender and Statistical Regions
2020
Journal:  
Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

It is accepted that the presence of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in large scale examinations may be an indication of bias. The aim of the present study was to analyze whether dichotomous (1-0) items in the PISA 2015 mathematics subtest exhibit DIF with regard to gender and statistical regions. The study was carried out using the data of 2409 students who took part in PISA 2015 and answered all mathematics questions. Rasch model was used via Winsteps software to determine whether the items exhibit DIF or not. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was applied to the sixty-three mathematics questions in the clusters. The modification indices and goodness of fit values were examined for CFA and a total of eight items that disrupt the model structure were excluded from the test. DIF analyses were carried out for the 55 items that were observed to be one-dimensional. The analysis results based on gender indicated that five items exhibit DIF. Two of these items exhibit DIF in favor of girls, while three in favor of men. Statistically significant DIF findings were observed in all items when the analyses results based on statistical regional units were analyzed. While at least 10 DIF cases were observed as a result of the binary territory comparison on an item basis, maximum 38 DIF cases were observed. Minimum DIF was observed in item Q4 as a result of regional comparisons, whereas maximum DIF was observed in items Q47 and Q50.

Keywords:

0
2020
Author:  
Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 347
Cite : 2.345
2023 Impact : 0.356
Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi