User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 1
The Effect of Protective Measures for Health Workers During COVID-19
2020
Journal:  
Ankara Medical Journal
Author:  
Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Protective measures for health workers, who have delicate roles throughout the pandemic, have been a part of the precautions taken since the onset of the first COVID-19 case in our country. In this context, countrywide precautions taken specifically to primary health care workers would be examined with a predominance on personal protective equipment (PPE). METHODS: In our study, the details of PPE delivery (surgical mask, N95 mask, eye wears, gloves, surgical overalls, disinfectant, face-shield) to 3996 personnel in 25 family health centers of Ankara and 2380 personnel working for District Health Directorates/Public Health Centers/Integrated State Hospitals during the study interval were given. The distribution of COVID-19 positivity among primary health care workers based on the place and institute worked and the comparison of PCR test results for family health center personnel formerly tested positive by Rapid Antigen Test was compared. RESULTS: In our city, 1,023,850 surgical masks, 96,627 N95 masks, 8,439 eye wears, 1,995,230 gloves, 62,805 surgical overalls, 11,961 L disinfectant, and 2,961 face-shields were distributed to the family health center and district personnel. 14 out of the 691 COVID-19 (+) cases amongst 53,124 health workers were primary health care workers. In 1,568 family physicians; 1,531 family healthcare personnel; 897 group personnel and 2,380 District Health Directorates/Public Health Centers/Integrated State Hospital personnel; 7,2,3 and 2 positive cases were observed, respectively. PCR testing was performed for the 27 family health center personnel (0.65%) out of 4,156 who tested positive by the formerly applied Rapid Antigen Test and only 2 came as PCR (+). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In Ankara, logistical support is prioritized to enforce primary healthcare staff and to effectively implement the preventive measures during the COVID-19 struggle.

Keywords:

0
2020
Author:  
Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles












Ankara Medical Journal

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 689
Cite : 1.644
2023 Impact : 0.136
Ankara Medical Journal