Abstract:

In recent years, in the banners they carry, women strive to show the deficiencies by deconstructing the masculine discourse and drawing attention to the fact that this discourse's completeness, capability, and absoluteness are illusional. Feminine discourse exposes the impossibility of completeness and wholeness. Impossible integrity, absolute and fulfillment are accepted in feminine discourse. Because impossibility is a person's black spot that is not linguistically represented. It cannot be sufficiently expressed but is recognized metonymically as partial parts, even if expressed. Contrary to feminine discourse, the impossibility of this satisfaction is suspended in a masculine course. The feminine discourse reveals the truth by deconstructing this illusion. The masculine discourse confronts its reality and attributes its dissatisfaction to the feminine discourse, even the wickedness of the feminine discourse. In their banners, women traversed all the masculine discourse fantasies about themselves, identifying with the common discourse produced by the masculine discourse about themselves. Therefore, they tried to undermine both the violence and the pleasure of the masculine discourse by taking away the masculine discourse's fantasy against the female or feminine discourse and deprived the masculine of his asset The foundation of the violence against women is the possibility of the feminine discourse to destroy the omnipotence phantasy by highlighting the gaps of the masculine discourse. Nevertheless, the source of the primary complaint of dissatisfaction is displayed in the language by hiding it. Every discourse on what is not represented in linguistic expression continues to hide even though it strives to explain what is depicted. 

Keywords: