Özet:

The main sources that shape the culture of eating and drinking of Muslims in the framework of what is eaten and what is not renewed are the Qur’an and the Sunnah. But the framework that these resources draw about eating and drinking has general lines, has relatively proportional aspects, and therefore prepares the ground for disputes on whether or not some things can be consumed. It is one of the important examples of these discussions that which of the products derived from the sea can be considered legal under which conditions. What is meant with "marine product" is the living beings that are completely dependent on water, i.e. who eaten or breathe in the water and can only be fed here, and therefore the life is connected only to the sea. There are two different opinions on the judgment of eating them. According to the first opinion that the Hanefī defend, only fish are eaten in seafood. It is also necessary to catch the fish in order to eat it. The fish that died of themselves and the cause of death is unknown cannot be eaten. However, the fish that is achieved as dead may be consumed, which does not prevent it from eating such as disease, for example, the fish that is determined to die for a reason such as being thrown to the coast by the sea. According to the other three major religions, all the beings with the "marine living" vase, whatever way they are obtained, are lawful; there is no religion in their consumption. If the living beings that can live both on the ground and in the water can not be defeated or defeated, it is contradictory between these disciples and even each disciples within themselves. The main factor that causes this difference between the four religions is the discretion of the verses concerning the subject; the hadiths, in addition to the verses, are also open to discussion.

Anahtar Kelimeler: