Özet:

The length of trials in many developed states in terms of the legal system is a serious problem. In this context, lawmakers tend to solve many legal disputes by alternative means and thus reduce the workload of the judicial bodies. The reduction of the labor burden of the judicial bodies will enable both the current cases to be concluded in the shortest time and by better investigation. Our lawmakers have also introduced two new trials for this purpose. Our criminal judgment system, in 2019, is one of the two important institutions entering the Law No. 7188 as a series judge. This institution, which hosts exceptional and unusual practices, has brought serious discussions in the doctrine with it. The series of judges are concerned with serious issues, especially in terms of the right to fair trial. This procedure, aimed at reducing the labor burden of the courts and accelerating the trial, seriously interferes with the rights recognized by individuals in the field of trial law. These interventions are a very framework issue that is reasonable in terms of the right to a fair trial and some constitutional principles. Our study has been assessed in terms of the right to fair trial and some other constitutional principles. In this context, the general findings on the serial trial procedure were first made, and then the requirements of the right to fair trial were revealed. Finally, it has been determined whether this new institution has caused violations in terms of the right to fair trial and some other constitutional principles.

Anahtar Kelimeler: