User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 28
 Downloands 3
Bazı yeni sabitleyici dental sistemler ile desteklenen seramik kronların kırılma yükü
2018
Journal:  
Acta Odontologica Turcica
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the fracture load of endocrown restorations and fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) fabricated through computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) for post–cores of anterior teeth. Materials and Method: Forty post–core-supported crowns and endocrowns were fabricated through CAD-CAM on a canine root zirconia model (Ice Zirconia, ZirkonZahn GmBH, Bruneck, Italy). The static load-bearing capacity was measured on the following restoration groups: Group 1: zirconia crown (Prettau anterior, ZirkonZahn GmBH) retained with CAD-CAM one-piece FRC post-core crown system (experimental CAD-CAM FRC block); Group 2: zirconia crown (Prettau anterior) retained with FRC post (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with discontinuous fiber composite (EverX posterior, GC Corp) core; Group 3: zirconia endocrown (Prettau anterior); and Group 4: lithium disilicate ceramic endocrown (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (n = 10/per group). After the adhesive cementation of crowns/endocrowns to the zirconia root model, a load was applied at 45° to the long axis of the teeth and measured using a universal testing machine. The fracture modes were visually examined. The statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (p < 0.05). Results: The fracture load significantly differed among the groups (p < 0.05) and was ranked as follows: Group 3 (1168 ± 141 N) > Group 4 (721 ± 96 N) ≥ Group 1 (680 ± 86 N) > Group 2 (534 ± 36 N). Conclusion: Endocrown monoblock restorations can be used as an alternative to fiber-reinforced post–core supported crown restorations.

Keywords:

The breaking load of ceramic crowns supported by some new fixing dental systems
2018
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the fracture load of endocrown restorations and fiber-renforced composites (FRCs) manufactured through computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) for post-cores of anterior teeth. Materials and Method: Forty post-core-supported crowns and endocrowns were manufactured through CAD-CAM on a canine root zirconia model (Ice Zirconia, ZirkonZahn GmBH, Bruneck, Italy). The static load-bearing capacity was measured on the following restoration groups: Group 1: zirconia crown (Prettau anterior, ZirkonZahn GmBH) retained with CAD-CAM one-piece FRC post-core crown system (experimental CAD-CAM FRC block); Group 2: zirconia crown (Prettau anterior) retained with FRC post (GC Corp. , Tokyo, Japan) with discontinuous fiber composite (EverX posterior, GC Corp) core; Group 3: zirconia endocrown (Prettau anterior); and Group 4: lithium disilicate ceramic endocrown (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (n = 10/per group). After the adhesive cementation of crowns/endocrowns to the zirconia root model, a load was applied at 45° to the long axis of the teeth and measured using a universal testing machine. The fracture modes were visually examined. The statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (p < 0.05). Results: The fracture load significantly differed among the groups (p < 0.05) and was ranked as follows: Group 3 (1168 ± 141 N) > Group 4 (721 ± 96 N) ≥ Group 1 (680 ± 86 N) > Group 2 (534 ± 36 N). Conclusion: Endocrown monoblock restorations can be used as an alternative to fiber-reinforced post-core supported crown restorations.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Acta Odontologica Turcica

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 866
Cite : 719
Acta Odontologica Turcica