Özet:

In the study, the reflection of the information contained in the works related to the science of al-Wujūh wa al-Nazāir on interpretation was examined by the example of two works of Muqātil Ibn Sulaymān. These are the works called al-Wujūh wa al-Nazāir fi’Qur’ani’l-‘Azīm and Tafsiru Muqātil Ibn Sulaymān. The study focuses on two aspects, one of which will be the basis for the other. The first one is the prominent features of the two works in the context of al-Wujūh wa al-Nazāir. Here, in order to contribute to the understanding of the subject, the formal and contextual aspects of the two works in question are focused on. The second part of the study is the comparison of the wech and nazīrs contained in al-Wujūh wa al-Nazāir with the explanations in tafsir in the context of the relevant verse. In this section, while making determinations and evaluations, the fact that the two works were written for different purposes was taken into account. As it is known, letter, word or expression patterns containing different meanings are discussed in the al-Wujūh wa al-Nazāir work and examples of these are given. In a tafsir work, a section of a verse, a verse or a group of verses is explained. In the second part, it is focused on whether Muqātil prefers the explanation he prefers for letters, words or expression patterns in al-Wujūh wa al-Nazāir in Tafsiru Muqātil Ibn Sulaymān. If he preferred these, the exact same, similar and different aspects of his explanation were focused on. As a result of the comparison, it was understood that Muqātil’s preferences in the two works largely coincide in meaning, if not verbally.

Anahtar Kelimeler: