Abstract:

According to modern research, the greatest weaknesses of the bourgeois states are the conflicts within the dynasty. The main reason behind these conflicts is the fact that each of the members of the tribe, who owned the land, claimed the right to the throne. Their rights on the throne are the veracetate system that allows every son of a ruler to be a heir. According to the nature of the system, the throne could pass from father to son, from brother to brother, from uncle to uncle, and even from uncle to uncle. Some researchers thought that there was no veraceted system in the corrupt political culture, based on the system’s production of too many alternatives. In this study, the work of the system will be investigated by the idea that the corrupt people have developed a veracity system and that the system has a primary impact on political stability. The vertical veracity in which the throne passed from the father to the son only reduced the conflict as it gave the king's sons the opportunity to become power. If the ruler appointed one of his sons to guardian, there would usually be no conflict. The horizontal and crossover veracity where the throne passed from brother to brother or uncle to grandson, sometimes did not lead to a short-term conflict. But in the long run, the throne struggle between the cousins was inevitable. All these procedures have a primary impact on stability because they open or close the door to domestic war, division, or external intervention.

Keywords: